Badam Bai vs State PP — 163/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 13th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJJW010004642026
Filing Number
373/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
163/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Jhalawar District HQ
Judge
11-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
Jhalawar Sadar
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Badam Bai
Adv. Mr. Ramesh Chand Meghwal
Respondent(s)
State PP (Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 11-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Badam Bai v. State of Rajasthan (CIS 163/2026) The Session Court granted bail to petitioner Badam Bai (age 42) in a murder case where her husband was shot and killed on January 24, 2026. The court found that while the FIR named other accused persons (Jagdish, Dulheshih, and others) with actual involvement in the shooting, the petitioner was not named in the original police report or identified by eyewitnesses in their statements. Observing that no evidence linked the petitioner to the crime and her criminal record was nil, the court approved bail on furnishing a bond of ₹50,000 or two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Badam Bai v. State of Rajasthan (CIS 163/2026) The Session Court granted bail to petitioner Badam Bai (age 42) in a murder case where her husband was shot and killed on January 24, 2026. The court found that while the FIR named other accused persons (Jagdish, Dulheshih, and others) with actual involvement in the shooting, the petitioner was not named in the original police report or identified by eyewitnesses in their statements. Observing that no evidence linked the petitioner to the crime and her criminal record was nil, the court approved bail on furnishing a bond of ₹50,000 or two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts