Sunil Bheel vs State PP — 159/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJJW010004192026

Filing Number

333/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

159/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Jhalawar District HQ

Judge

11-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

27

Police Station

Asnawar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sunil Bheel

    Adv. Sh. Chainsingh Lodha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Session Court in Jhalawar rejected the bail petition (under Section 483 CrPC) of 18-year-old Sunil, who was arrested for allegedly attacking three individuals (Aleksh, Bharat, and Lalit) with a knife on February 13, 2026. The court found that medical reports confirmed grievous injuries to the victims and that witness statements corroborated the FIR charges under IPC Sections 115(2) and 109(1), making the case prima facie serious with sufficient grounds for continued custody pending investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 159/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Session Court in Jhalawar rejected the bail petition (under Section 483 CrPC) of 18-year-old Sunil, who was arrested for allegedly attacking three individuals (Aleksh, Bharat, and Lalit) with a knife on February 13, 2026. The court found that medical reports confirmed grievous injuries to the victims and that witness statements corroborated the FIR charges under IPC Sections 115(2) and 109(1), making the case prima facie serious with sufficient grounds for continued custody pending investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case