Vinod vs State PP — 150/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJJW010003242026

Filing Number

245/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

150/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Jhalawar District HQ

Judge

11-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

25

Police Station

Jhalarapatan

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vinod

    Adv. Mr. Pritam Rai Kumawat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Session Court in Jhalawar granted bail to the accused (Vinod, age 25) in a theft case involving stolen machinery and equipment from an oil factory, finding insufficient evidence against him during investigation. The court imposed bail conditions requiring either a personal bond of ₹30,000 or two sureties of ₹15,000 each, noting that the investigation had not established sufficient grounds to detain the accused and that the charges under IPC sections 331(4) and 305(A) remained preliminary in nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 150/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Session Court in Jhalawar granted bail to the accused (Vinod, age 25) in a theft case involving stolen machinery and equipment from an oil factory, finding insufficient evidence against him during investigation. The court imposed bail conditions requiring either a personal bond of ₹30,000 or two sureties of ₹15,000 each, noting that the investigation had not established sufficient grounds to detain the accused and that the charges under IPC sections 331(4) and 305(A) remained preliminary in nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case