ANITA SHARMA vs State Government — 231/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJJM280009222026

Filing Number

399/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

231/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Sanganer Court Complex

Judge

1-ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

904

Police Station

Muhana

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANITA SHARMA

    Adv. shankar choudhary

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 231/2026 - Anita Sharma v. State Government Decision: The court GRANTED anticipatory bail to petitioner Anita Sharma under Section 438 CrPC in a case involving allegations of fraud, forgery, and criminal conspiracy (IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B). The petitioner was required to furnish personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, with conditions including full cooperation in investigation and remaining available for questioning. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the respondent state alleged petitioner had forged property documents and created fraudulent witness statements regarding a disputed 300 sq. meter plot, the evidence showed the petitioner's affidavit was validly registered and the opposing Power of Attorney was merely notarized. Given that the petitioner is a woman suffering from chronic ailments, willing to cooperate fully, and a civil suit on the same property matter was already pending with property sealed, the circumstances justified granting anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I

  7. 28-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I

  8. 27-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I

  10. 19-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 231/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 231/2026 - Anita Sharma v. State Government Decision: The court GRANTED anticipatory bail to petitioner Anita Sharma under Section 438 CrPC in a case involving allegations of fraud, forgery, and criminal conspiracy (IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B). The petitioner was required to furnish personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, with conditions including full cooperation in investigation and remaining available for questioning. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the respondent state alleged petitioner had forged property documents and created fraudulent witness statements regarding a disputed 300 sq. meter plot, the evidence showed the petitioner's affidavit was validly registered and the opposing Power of Attorney was merely notarized. Given that the petitioner is a woman suffering from chronic ailments, willing to cooperate fully, and a civil suit on the same property matter was already pending with property sealed, the circumstances justified granting anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case