KHALYARI MEENA vs State Government — 227/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJJM280009192026

Filing Number

396/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

227/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Sanganer Court Complex

Judge

1-ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

Sanganer Sadar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KHALYARI MEENA

    Adv. Sunil Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary: Khalyari Meena's bail petition under Section 483 CrPC was rejected by the court on 27.03.2026. The petitioner faced charges under IPC Sections 64(2)(m), 308(2), and 351(2) involving allegations of sexual assault, extortion, and intimidation against a woman. The court found prima facie evidence of serious crimes including multiple instances of misconduct, video recording without consent, threats to circulate such material, and extortion of money. The court determined that given the grave nature of the allegations and the complainant's testimony documenting the abuse, granting bail would be unjustified, thus dismissing the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 227/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Khalyari Meena's bail petition under Section 483 CrPC was rejected by the court on 27.03.2026. The petitioner faced charges under IPC Sections 64(2)(m), 308(2), and 351(2) involving allegations of sexual assault, extortion, and intimidation against a woman. The court found prima facie evidence of serious crimes including multiple instances of misconduct, video recording without consent, threats to circulate such material, and extortion of money. The court determined that given the grave nature of the allegations and the complainant's testimony documenting the abuse, granting bail would be unjustified, thus dismissing the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case