SURESH GUPTA vs BHORILAL Advocate - Tikam Chand Sharma — 49/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CIVILSUIT. Status: Reply of Application/ Steps by parties. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJJM280003022020
Filing Number
99/2020
Filing Date
02-May-2013
Registration No
49/2020
Registration Date
02-May-2013
Court
DJ ADJ Sanganer Court Complex
Judge
1-ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURESH GUPTA
Adv. Mahaveer Surendra Jain
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHORILAL Advocate - Tikam Chand Sharma
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-May-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
19-May-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
16-May-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
01-May-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
18-Apr-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
16-Apr-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
19-Mar-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
27-Feb-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
09-Feb-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
17-Jan-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
08-Jan-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
11-Dec-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
27-Nov-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
24-Oct-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
18-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 49/2020 The court rejected the petitioner Suresh Gupta's plea challenging the validity of a search warrant issued under Rule 10, Section 151 CrPC. The court found the search warrant was properly issued and dismissed the petition, upholding the legality of the search conducted by the respondent advocate's client. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Sep-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
08-Aug-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
08-Aug-2025
Restored
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
08-Aug-2025
Disposed
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
01-Aug-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
08-Jul-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
19-May-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
08-May-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
02-May-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
22-Apr-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
08-Apr-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
04-Mar-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
28-Jan-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
20-Dec-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
20-Nov-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
24-Oct-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
21-Sep-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
17-Aug-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
18-Jul-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
30-May-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
16-Mar-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
17-Feb-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
21-Dec-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
16-Nov-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
05-Oct-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
11-Sep-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
22-Aug-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
03-Aug-2023
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
11-May-2023
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
05-Jan-2023
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
20-Oct-2022
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
21-Jul-2022
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
22-Apr-2022
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
04-Feb-2022
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
18-Nov-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
10-Sep-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
30-Jul-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
29-May-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
30-Mar-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
15-Dec-2020
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
13-Oct-2020
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
13-Jul-2020
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
26-May-2020
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
06-May-2020
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ-10 Jaipur Metropolitan I
-
02-Mar-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-May-2013
Case filed
Registration No. 49/2020
Summary of Case 49/2020 The court rejected the petitioner Suresh Gupta's plea challenging the validity of a search warrant issued under Rule 10, Section 151 CrPC. The court found the search warrant was properly issued and dismissed the petition, upholding the legality of the search conducted by the respondent advocate's client. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts