Gordhan Mittal vs Tehsil dar chirawa Advocate - rakesh arya — 41/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 00. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed otherwise on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)

CNR: RJJH230001472025

Filing Number

147/2025

Filing Date

24-Nov-2022

Registration No

41/2025

Registration Date

28-Nov-2022

Court

ACJM CHIRAWA CIV

Judge

1-Acjm

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed otherwise

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gordhan Mittal

    Adv. avdesh kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tehsil dar chirawa Advocate - rakesh arya

  2. 2.Exucation Officer Nagar palika chirawsa

  3. 3.Prasidenct Nagar palika chirawa

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed petitioner Gordhan Mittal's petition seeking relief against government officials for allegedly wrongfully issuing an encroachment notice under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act regarding disputed property (Plot 58). The court found that the property was classified as "gairmumkin johad" (barren/non-cultivable government land) in revenue records and that Mittal's possession constituted illegal encroachment, making the notice legally valid. The court held that Mittal had no legitimate claim and that procedural fairness concerns were adequately addressed, as even a High Court judgment (2004) confirmed no private ownership rights could exist over such government land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 02-May-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Acjm

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Acjm

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  10. 16-Dec-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  11. 12-Nov-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Acjm

  12. 18-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 24-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 41/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed petitioner Gordhan Mittal's petition seeking relief against government officials for allegedly wrongfully issuing an encroachment notice under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act regarding disputed property (Plot 58). The court found that the property was classified as "gairmumkin johad" (barren/non-cultivable government land) in revenue records and that Mittal's possession constituted illegal encroachment, making the notice legally valid. The court held that Mittal had no legitimate claim and that procedural fairness concerns were adequately addressed, as even a High Court judgment (2004) confirmed no private ownership rights could exist over such government land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case