Gordhan Mittal vs Tehsil dar chirawa Advocate - rakesh arya — 41/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 00. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed otherwise on 15th May 2026.

Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)

CNR: RJJH230001472025

Case disposed

Filing Number

147/2025

Filing Date

24-11-2022

Registration No

41/2025

Registration Date

28-11-2022

Court

ACJM CHIRAWA CIV

Judge

1-ACJM

Decision Date

15th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed otherwise

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 00

Petitioner(s)

Gordhan Mittal

Adv. avdesh kumar

Respondent(s)

Tehsil dar chirawa Advocate - rakesh arya

Exucation Officer Nagar palika chirawsa

Prasidenct Nagar palika chirawa

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ACJM

15-05-2026

Disposed

02-05-2026

Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

21-04-2026

Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

12-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

27-02-2026

Orders

Final Orders / Judgements

15-05-2026
Order

The court dismissed petitioner Gordhan Mittal's petition seeking relief against government officials for allegedly wrongfully issuing an encroachment notice under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act regarding disputed property (Plot 58). The court found that the property was classified as "gairmumkin johad" (barren/non-cultivable government land) in revenue records and that Mittal's possession constituted illegal encroachment, making the notice legally valid. The court held that Mittal had no legitimate claim and that procedural fairness concerns were adequately addressed, as even a High Court judgment (2004) confirmed no private ownership rights could exist over such government land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed petitioner Gordhan Mittal's petition seeking relief against government officials for allegedly wrongfully issuing an encroachment notice under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act regarding disputed property (Plot 58). The court found that the property was classified as "gairmumkin johad" (barren/non-cultivable government land) in revenue records and that Mittal's possession constituted illegal encroachment, making the notice legally valid. The court held that Mittal had no legitimate claim and that procedural fairness concerns were adequately addressed, as even a High Court judgment (2004) confirmed no private ownership rights could exist over such government land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ACJM CHIRAWA CIV All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case