Nihal devi vs Tehsil dar chirawa Advocate - rakesh arya — 40/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 00. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed otherwise on 15th May 2026.
Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)
CNR: RJJH230001452025
Filing Number
145/2025
Filing Date
24-11-2022
Registration No
40/2025
Registration Date
24-11-2022
Court
ACJM CHIRAWA CIV
Judge
1-ACJM
Decision Date
15th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed otherwise
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nihal devi
Adv. avdesh kumar
Respondent(s)
Tehsil dar chirawa Advocate - rakesh arya
Excutiove Officer nagar palika chiara
Prasident nagar palika chirawa
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ACJM
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-05-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 21-04-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 27-02-2026 | Orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY Petitioner Nihal Devi's petition challenging an eviction notice regarding Plot No. 23 in Chirawa was dismissed. The court found that the disputed property is classified as non-municipal government land (khatar number 1001), and the petitioner's claim of ownership is invalid. The Tahsildar's notice under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act was found to be lawful, as the petitioner has no legal right over government property, regardless of any prior private transactions. The court upheld prior High Court precedent (DB Civil Writ 1536/2003) prohibiting unauthorized occupation of government land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY Petitioner Nihal Devi's petition challenging an eviction notice regarding Plot No. 23 in Chirawa was dismissed. The court found that the disputed property is classified as non-municipal government land (khatar number 1001), and the petitioner's claim of ownership is invalid. The Tahsildar's notice under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act was found to be lawful, as the petitioner has no legal right over government property, regardless of any prior private transactions. The court upheld prior High Court precedent (DB Civil Writ 1536/2003) prohibiting unauthorized occupation of government land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts