STATE vs karan singh Advocate - anoop singh — 908/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 30th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJJH180014102019
Filing Number
1354/2019
Filing Date
10-Dec-2019
Registration No
908/2019
Registration Date
10-Dec-2019
Court
JM COURT BUHANA
Judge
13-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
186
Police Station
Pacheri kalan
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Adv. apo
Respondent(s)
-
1.karan singh Advocate - anoop singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Copy of document.View PDF
Case Summary: State v. Karan Singh (908/2019) Court Decision (March 30, 2026): The Judicial Magistrate found defendant Karan Singh guilty of rash/negligent driving (IPC §279, 337) and operating an unregistered vehicle (Motor Vehicles Act §146/196), but acquitted him of causing grievous injury (IPC §338) due to insufficient evidence. The court sentenced him to probation under the Probation of Offenders Act with ₹10,000 bond and ₹4,000 prosecution costs, rather than imprisonment, considering his rural background and eight-year trial duration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2026
Final arguments
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Nov-2025
Final arguments
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Sep-2025
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Sep-2025
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Sep-2025
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Jul-2025
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
06-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Nov-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jul-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Nov-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Jul-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Apr-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jan-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Oct-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jul-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Apr-2021
Prosecution Evidence
-
18-Jan-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Nov-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Sep-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Aug-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
30-May-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Apr-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Dec-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 908/2019
Case Summary: State v. Karan Singh (908/2019) Court Decision (March 30, 2026): The Judicial Magistrate found defendant Karan Singh guilty of rash/negligent driving (IPC §279, 337) and operating an unregistered vehicle (Motor Vehicles Act §146/196), but acquitted him of causing grievous injury (IPC §338) due to insufficient evidence. The court sentenced him to probation under the Probation of Offenders Act with ₹10,000 bond and ₹4,000 prosecution costs, rather than imprisonment, considering his rural background and eight-year trial duration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts