suresh kumar vs rakesh saini — 709/2021
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 23rd March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJJH180012632021
Filing Number
1155/2021
Filing Date
10-Nov-2021
Registration No
709/2021
Registration Date
10-Nov-2021
Court
JM COURT BUHANA
Judge
13-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Sentenced
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.suresh kumar
Adv. SH. MAHESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.rakesh saini
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of document.View PDF
Case Summary: Suresh Kumar v. Rakesh Saini (Case 709/2021) Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate convicted defendant Rakesh Saini under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a dishonored check. Saini borrowed ₹3,00,000 from petitioner Suresh Kumar and issued check No. 050790 dated 14.08.2021 for ₹3,00,000, which was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds on 20.08.2021. Despite receiving a legal notice, Saini neither repaid the amount nor responded to the notice. Sentence: One year rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹4,00,000 (with 15 days additional imprisonment in default of fine payment). The fine amount is to be paid as compensation to the petitioner under CrPC Section 357. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jan-2026
Final arguments
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Nov-2025
Final arguments
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2025
Final arguments
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Aug-2025
Final arguments
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jun-2025
Final arguments
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Apr-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Feb-2025
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Dec-2024
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
28-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jan-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Sep-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Jul-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
05-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Feb-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Oct-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Aug-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Jun-2022
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Nov-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 709/2021
Case Summary: Suresh Kumar v. Rakesh Saini (Case 709/2021) Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate convicted defendant Rakesh Saini under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a dishonored check. Saini borrowed ₹3,00,000 from petitioner Suresh Kumar and issued check No. 050790 dated 14.08.2021 for ₹3,00,000, which was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds on 20.08.2021. Despite receiving a legal notice, Saini neither repaid the amount nor responded to the notice. Sentence: One year rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹4,00,000 (with 15 days additional imprisonment in default of fine payment). The fine amount is to be paid as compensation to the petitioner under CrPC Section 357. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts