STATE vs sandeep kumar Advocate - SH. SUSHIL VARMA — 259/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 07th April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJJH180003772021
Filing Number
351/2021
Filing Date
16-Feb-2021
Registration No
259/2021
Registration Date
16-Feb-2021
Court
JM COURT BUHANA
Judge
13-Jm
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
183
Police Station
Singhana
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Adv. apo
Respondent(s)
-
1.sandeep kumar Advocate - SH. SUSHIL VARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy of document.View PDF
Summary of Case 259/2021 The court acquitted the accused, Sandeep Kumar, of charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife) and 406 (criminal breach of trust/misappropriation of dowry) due to insufficient evidence. While the complainant alleged systematic harassment and demands for dowry (₹5 lakh and a Maruti car) over 9 years following their 2011 marriage, the prosecution failed to establish these allegations with concrete proof—no specific dates, recovery of demanded items, or consistent witness corroboration was provided. The court found critical gaps in the prosecution's case and noted the complainant's nine-year delay in filing the complaint, contradictions in witness statements, and lack of documentary evidence regarding dowry given at marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Jm
-
12-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Jm
-
30-Jan-2026
Final arguments
Jm
-
10-Dec-2025
Final arguments
Jm
-
31-Oct-2025
Final arguments
Jm
-
20-Sep-2025
Final arguments
Jm
-
22-Aug-2025
Final arguments
Jm
-
31-Jul-2025
Final arguments
Jm
-
18-Jun-2025
Final arguments
Jm
-
09-Apr-2025
Final arguments
Jm
-
28-Feb-2025
Final arguments
Jm
-
15-Jan-2025
Final arguments
Jm
-
05-Dec-2024
Final arguments
Jm
-
17-Oct-2024
Final arguments
Jm
-
12-Sep-2024
Defence Evidence
Jm
-
20-Jul-2024
Defence Evidence
Jm
-
23-May-2024
Defence Evidence
Jm
-
04-Apr-2024
Defence Evidence
Jm
-
24-Jan-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
19-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
31-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
14-Jul-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
19-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
03-Mar-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
07-Feb-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
06-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
15-Sep-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
17-Jun-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
14-Mar-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
29-Nov-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
26-Aug-2021
Prosecution Evidence
-
02-Aug-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
-
10-May-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
-
16-Mar-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 259/2021
Summary of Case 259/2021 The court acquitted the accused, Sandeep Kumar, of charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife) and 406 (criminal breach of trust/misappropriation of dowry) due to insufficient evidence. While the complainant alleged systematic harassment and demands for dowry (₹5 lakh and a Maruti car) over 9 years following their 2011 marriage, the prosecution failed to establish these allegations with concrete proof—no specific dates, recovery of demanded items, or consistent witness corroboration was provided. The court found critical gaps in the prosecution's case and noted the complainant's nine-year delay in filing the complaint, contradictions in witness statements, and lack of documentary evidence regarding dowry given at marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts