State vs Pankaj Kumar Advocate - Shri Sunil Jhakar — 239/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,338. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 02nd April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJJH140005802021
Filing Number
239/2021
Filing Date
18-12-2021
Registration No
239/2021
Registration Date
18-12-2021
Court
Gram Nayayalaya Nawalgarh
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation
FIR Details
FIR Number
443
Police Station
Nawalgarh police station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
Pankaj Kumar Advocate - Shri Sunil Jhakar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 23-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Pankaj Kumar (Case 239/2021) Court Decision: The Village Court of Navalgarh, Jhunjhunu acquitted accused Pankaj Kumar (age 23) under IPC Sections 279 and 338 on April 2, 2026, giving him the benefit of doubt. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly operated his motorcycle (RJ 18 SW 9801) and caused a collision with a Roadways bus (RJ 11 PA 1841) on August 30, 2021, injuring two persons. Key Reasoning: Although eyewitness accounts from the bus driver and conductor described a collision, the court noted internal contradictions in their testimonies, lack of independent corroboration, and credibility concerns. The court held that merely proving a collision occurred does not establish the accused drove recklessly or negligently—prosecution bore the burden of proving mens rea beyond reasonable doubt, which it failed to discharge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Pankaj Kumar (Case 239/2021) Court Decision: The Village Court of Navalgarh, Jhunjhunu acquitted accused Pankaj Kumar (age 23) under IPC Sections 279 and 338 on April 2, 2026, giving him the benefit of doubt. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly operated his motorcycle (RJ 18 SW 9801) and caused a collision with a Roadways bus (RJ 11 PA 1841) on August 30, 2021, injuring two persons. Key Reasoning: Although eyewitness accounts from the bus driver and conductor described a collision, the court noted internal contradictions in their testimonies, lack of independent corroboration, and credibility concerns. The court held that merely proving a collision occurred does not establish the accused drove recklessly or negligently—prosecution bore the burden of proving mens rea beyond reasonable doubt, which it failed to discharge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts