State vs Dr. Rajkumar Sharma Advocate - Shri Kishor Kumar Jangir — 75/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143, 323, 506, 171C. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJJH140003392025

Filing Number

287/2025

Filing Date

15-Jul-2025

Registration No

75/2025

Registration Date

15-Jul-2025

Court

Gram Nayayalaya Nawalgarh

Judge

1-Nyayadhikari

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

41

Police Station

Gothra Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143, 323, 506, 171C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. Mr. Vikas Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dr. Rajkumar Sharma Advocate - Shri Kishor Kumar Jangir

  2. 2.Suresh Gujjar

  3. 3.Dalip

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Dr. Rajkumar Sharma & Others (Case 75/2025) Court Decision: The Village Court of Navalgadh (Jhunjhunu District) acquitted all five defendants of charges under IPC sections 143, 323, 506, and 171, citing insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: The prosecution alleged that on November 25, 2023, Dr. Rajkumar Sharma (a political candidate) and four associates assaulted complainant Pavan Kumar at a marketplace during legislative assembly elections because the victim refused to vote for Sharma. The court found the prosecution's case unreliable due to contradictions in witness testimony, lack of corroborating evidence, absence of visible injuries despite alleged beatings, and investigative gaps regarding polling booth protocols and security personnel presence during the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Nyayadhikari

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Nyayadhikari

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Nyayadhikari

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Nyayadhikari

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Nyayadhikari

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Nyayadhikari

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Nyayadhikari

  10. 20-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    Nyayadhikari

  11. 06-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    Nyayadhikari

  12. 18-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    Nyayadhikari

  13. 09-Dec-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Nyayadhikari

  14. 01-Dec-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Nyayadhikari

  15. 25-Nov-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Nyayadhikari

  16. 21-Nov-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Nyayadhikari

  17. 04-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  18. 15-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  19. 23-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  20. 09-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  21. 21-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  22. 13-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  23. 29-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 15-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Dr. Rajkumar Sharma & Others (Case 75/2025) Court Decision: The Village Court of Navalgadh (Jhunjhunu District) acquitted all five defendants of charges under IPC sections 143, 323, 506, and 171, citing insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: The prosecution alleged that on November 25, 2023, Dr. Rajkumar Sharma (a political candidate) and four associates assaulted complainant Pavan Kumar at a marketplace during legislative assembly elections because the victim refused to vote for Sharma. The court found the prosecution's case unreliable due to contradictions in witness testimony, lack of corroborating evidence, absence of visible injuries despite alleged beatings, and investigative gaps regarding polling booth protocols and security personnel presence during the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case