State vs Dr. Rajkumar Sharma Advocate - Shri Kishor Kumar Jangir — 75/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143, 323, 506, 171C. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJJH140003392025
Filing Number
287/2025
Filing Date
15-07-2025
Registration No
75/2025
Registration Date
15-07-2025
Court
Gram Nayayalaya Nawalgarh
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
41
Police Station
Gothra Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. Mr. Vikas Sharma
Respondent(s)
Dr. Rajkumar Sharma Advocate - Shri Kishor Kumar Jangir
Suresh Gujjar
Dalip
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 06-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 21-02-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Dr. Rajkumar Sharma & Others (Case 75/2025) Court Decision: The Village Court of Navalgadh (Jhunjhunu District) acquitted all five defendants of charges under IPC sections 143, 323, 506, and 171, citing insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: The prosecution alleged that on November 25, 2023, Dr. Rajkumar Sharma (a political candidate) and four associates assaulted complainant Pavan Kumar at a marketplace during legislative assembly elections because the victim refused to vote for Sharma. The court found the prosecution's case unreliable due to contradictions in witness testimony, lack of corroborating evidence, absence of visible injuries despite alleged beatings, and investigative gaps regarding polling booth protocols and security personnel presence during the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Dr. Rajkumar Sharma & Others (Case 75/2025) Court Decision: The Village Court of Navalgadh (Jhunjhunu District) acquitted all five defendants of charges under IPC sections 143, 323, 506, and 171, citing insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: The prosecution alleged that on November 25, 2023, Dr. Rajkumar Sharma (a political candidate) and four associates assaulted complainant Pavan Kumar at a marketplace during legislative assembly elections because the victim refused to vote for Sharma. The court found the prosecution's case unreliable due to contradictions in witness testimony, lack of corroborating evidence, absence of visible injuries despite alleged beatings, and investigative gaps regarding polling booth protocols and security personnel presence during the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts