State vs Boyatram Advocate - Shri Sajjan kumar Chachar — 89/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,504,34. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJJH140002442023

Filing Number

225/2023

Filing Date

27-Apr-2023

Registration No

89/2023

Registration Date

27-Apr-2023

Court

Gram Nayayalaya Nawalgarh

Judge

1-Nyayadhikari

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

29

Police Station

Mukundgarh police station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,504,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. apo

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Boyatram Advocate - Shri Sajjan kumar Chachar

  2. 2.anil @ Tillu

  3. 3.Shankar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case 89/2023 Summary Court Decision: The Village Court, Navalgadh (Jhunjhunu District, Rajasthan) convicted all three accused—Boyatram, Anil Kumar (alias Tillu), and Shankar Kumar—under IPC Sections 341, 323, and 504/34 for assaulting and abusing the complainant on February 12, 2023. Rather than imprisonment, each was granted probation for one year under the Probation of Offenders Act with a bond of ₹10,000. Key Facts: The complainant's husband was beaten by the three accused while attempting to move his tractor through a field path; the accused were intoxicated and obstructed his passage, resulting in injuries to his head, neck, and spine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Nyayadhikari

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Nyayadhikari

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Nyayadhikari

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Nyayadhikari

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  8. 29-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  9. 29-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  10. 26-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  11. 18-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  12. 16-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  13. 05-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  14. 21-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  15. 15-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  16. 03-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  17. 29-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  18. 12-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  19. 24-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  20. 10-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  21. 02-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  22. 24-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  23. 06-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  24. 24-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  25. 11-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  26. 12-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  27. 09-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  28. 19-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  29. 03-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Nyayadhikari

  30. 20-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 27-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case 89/2023 Summary Court Decision: The Village Court, Navalgadh (Jhunjhunu District, Rajasthan) convicted all three accused—Boyatram, Anil Kumar (alias Tillu), and Shankar Kumar—under IPC Sections 341, 323, and 504/34 for assaulting and abusing the complainant on February 12, 2023. Rather than imprisonment, each was granted probation for one year under the Probation of Offenders Act with a bond of ₹10,000. Key Facts: The complainant's husband was beaten by the three accused while attempting to move his tractor through a field path; the accused were intoxicated and obstructed his passage, resulting in injuries to his head, neck, and spine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case