Birbal vs Nandlal Advocate - Shri Ashok Kumar Jangir — 13/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJJH140002432024
Filing Number
30/2024
Filing Date
06-May-2024
Registration No
13/2024
Registration Date
06-May-2024
Court
Gram Nayayalaya Nawalgarh
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Birbal
Adv. Shri Kishor Kumar Jangir
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nandlal Advocate - Shri Ashok Kumar Jangir
-
2.rajkumar
Case History
-
01-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
07-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
21-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
01-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
12-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
25-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
12-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
29-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
13-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
20-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
02-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
20-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
07-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
15-Oct-2025
JudgementView PDF
Summary of Case 13/2024 - Birbal v. Nandlal Advocate Outcome: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of petitioner Birbal against respondents Nandlal Advocate (Shri Ashok Kumar Jangir) and Rajkumar. The respondents are restrained from interfering with the disputed agricultural land pending final judgment in the main case. The court found that petitioner established a prima facie case regarding property rights and that the balance of convenience favors protecting the property status quo. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
24-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
06-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
19-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
19-Jul-2025
Issues
Nyayadhikari
-
30-Jun-2025
Issues
Nyayadhikari
-
30-May-2025
Issues
Nyayadhikari
-
16-May-2025
Issues
Nyayadhikari
-
25-Apr-2025
Issues
Nyayadhikari
-
05-Apr-2025
Issues
Nyayadhikari
-
15-Mar-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Nyayadhikari
-
14-Feb-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Nyayadhikari
-
21-Jan-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Nyayadhikari
-
03-Jan-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Nyayadhikari
-
04-Dec-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Nyayadhikari
-
14-Nov-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Nyayadhikari
-
21-Oct-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Nyayadhikari
-
24-Sep-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Nyayadhikari
-
28-Aug-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Nyayadhikari
-
01-Aug-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Nyayadhikari
-
06-Jul-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Nyayadhikari
-
20-May-2024
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Nyayadhikari
-
16-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 13/2024
Summary of Case 13/2024 - Birbal v. Nandlal Advocate Outcome: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of petitioner Birbal against respondents Nandlal Advocate (Shri Ashok Kumar Jangir) and Rajkumar. The respondents are restrained from interfering with the disputed agricultural land pending final judgment in the main case. The court found that petitioner established a prima facie case regarding property rights and that the balance of convenience favors protecting the property status quo. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts