State vs Ishwar Singh Advocate - Shri Deependra singh — 80/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJJH140002292022
Filing Number
200/2022
Filing Date
04-05-2022
Registration No
80/2022
Registration Date
04-05-2022
Court
Gram Nayayalaya Nawalgarh
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
54
Police Station
Mukundgarh police station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
Ishwar Singh Advocate - Shri Deependra singh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari
Disposed
Final arguments
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 26-02-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 17-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY In this road accident case from March 12, 2026, the Village Court of Navalgadh acquitted accused Ishwar Singh of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-A (causing death by negligence). The court found that while a woman died in a scooter-bus collision on April 7, 2022, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the bus or that he drove negligently. Key evidentiary gaps included: no eyewitness identified the driver, the vehicle's control system was mechanically defective (raising doubt about driver culpability), and witness testimonies contained contradictions. The accused was acquitted with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY In this road accident case from March 12, 2026, the Village Court of Navalgadh acquitted accused Ishwar Singh of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-A (causing death by negligence). The court found that while a woman died in a scooter-bus collision on April 7, 2022, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the bus or that he drove negligently. Key evidentiary gaps included: no eyewitness identified the driver, the vehicle's control system was mechanically defective (raising doubt about driver culpability), and witness testimonies contained contradictions. The accused was acquitted with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts