State vs Ishwar Singh Advocate - Shri Deependra singh — 80/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJJH140002292022

Case disposed

Filing Number

200/2022

Filing Date

04-05-2022

Registration No

80/2022

Registration Date

04-05-2022

Court

Gram Nayayalaya Nawalgarh

Judge

1-Nyayadhikari

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

54

Police Station

Mukundgarh police station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

Ishwar Singh Advocate - Shri Deependra singh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari

12-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

Final arguments

26-02-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

17-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

09-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Judgement

SUMMARY In this road accident case from March 12, 2026, the Village Court of Navalgadh acquitted accused Ishwar Singh of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-A (causing death by negligence). The court found that while a woman died in a scooter-bus collision on April 7, 2022, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the bus or that he drove negligently. Key evidentiary gaps included: no eyewitness identified the driver, the vehicle's control system was mechanically defective (raising doubt about driver culpability), and witness testimonies contained contradictions. The accused was acquitted with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY In this road accident case from March 12, 2026, the Village Court of Navalgadh acquitted accused Ishwar Singh of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-A (causing death by negligence). The court found that while a woman died in a scooter-bus collision on April 7, 2022, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the bus or that he drove negligently. Key evidentiary gaps included: no eyewitness identified the driver, the vehicle's control system was mechanically defective (raising doubt about driver culpability), and witness testimonies contained contradictions. The accused was acquitted with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gram Nayayalaya Nawalgarh All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case