State vs Parmendar Singh Advocate - Nemichand Dudi — 20/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 22nd April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJJH140000602022
Filing Number
45/2022
Filing Date
15-02-2022
Registration No
20/2022
Registration Date
15-02-2022
Court
Gram Nayayalaya Nawalgarh
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
13
Police Station
Nawalgarh police station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
Parmendar Singh Advocate - Nemichand Dudi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari
Disposed
Judgment
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 17-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 10-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 02-04-2026 | Final arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State v. Parmendra Singh (Case 20/2022) Court Decision: The accused, Parmendra Singh, has been acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (death by negligence). The court gave him the benefit of doubt regarding the fatal road accident. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Critical gaps existed in the evidence: witnesses provided contradictory accounts about the motorcycle's position and damage; the truck driver's excessive speed was not definitively established; and the deceased's own negligence in standing on the roadway while the motorcycle was parked contributed to the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Parmendra Singh (Case 20/2022) Court Decision: The accused, Parmendra Singh, has been acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (death by negligence). The court gave him the benefit of doubt regarding the fatal road accident. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Critical gaps existed in the evidence: witnesses provided contradictory accounts about the motorcycle's position and damage; the truck driver's excessive speed was not definitively established; and the deceased's own negligence in standing on the roadway while the motorcycle was parked contributed to the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts