State vs Anil Advocate - Shri Pradeep Kumar Jhajhariya — 21/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304a. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJJH140000552024
Filing Number
53/2024
Filing Date
31-Jan-2024
Registration No
21/2024
Registration Date
31-Jan-2024
Court
Gram Nayayalaya Nawalgarh
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
294
Police Station
Nawalgarh police station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. Apo
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anil Advocate - Shri Pradeep Kumar Jhajhariya
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Anil Kumar (Case 21/2024) Court Decision: The Village Court of Navalgadh acquitted defendant Anil Kumar of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence), granting him the benefit of doubt. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the pickup vehicle involved in the fatal accident. Witness testimony and investigation records revealed that the vehicle causing the accident was actually the accused's motorcycle, not a pickup truck as initially reported. Multiple witnesses either contradicted the prosecution narrative or refused to testify. The investigation officer himself admitted during cross-examination that no pickup vehicle was involved—the vehicle was a motorcycle (RJ 18 PS 4664). Without establishing the accused as the vehicle operator at the time of the accident, the prosecution could not prove the requisite elements of rash/negligent driving causing death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Nyayadhikari
-
09-Apr-2026
Judgment
Nyayadhikari
-
12-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
12-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
20-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
23-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
27-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
30-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
17-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
13-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
16-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
10-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
30-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
18-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
13-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
04-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
08-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
19-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
06-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
26-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
18-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Nyayadhikari
-
27-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jan-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 21/2024
Case Summary: State v. Anil Kumar (Case 21/2024) Court Decision: The Village Court of Navalgadh acquitted defendant Anil Kumar of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence), granting him the benefit of doubt. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the pickup vehicle involved in the fatal accident. Witness testimony and investigation records revealed that the vehicle causing the accident was actually the accused's motorcycle, not a pickup truck as initially reported. Multiple witnesses either contradicted the prosecution narrative or refused to testify. The investigation officer himself admitted during cross-examination that no pickup vehicle was involved—the vehicle was a motorcycle (RJ 18 PS 4664). Without establishing the accused as the vehicle operator at the time of the accident, the prosecution could not prove the requisite elements of rash/negligent driving causing death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts