State vs Anil Advocate - Shri Pradeep Kumar Jhajhariya — 21/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304a. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th April 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJJH140000552024

Case disposed

Filing Number

53/2024

Filing Date

31-01-2024

Registration No

21/2024

Registration Date

31-01-2024

Court

Gram Nayayalaya Nawalgarh

Judge

1-Nyayadhikari

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

294

Police Station

Nawalgarh police station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,304a

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. Apo

Respondent(s)

Anil Advocate - Shri Pradeep Kumar Jhajhariya

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari

10-04-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

Judgment

12-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

12-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

20-01-2026

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: State v. Anil Kumar (Case 21/2024) Court Decision: The Village Court of Navalgadh acquitted defendant Anil Kumar of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence), granting him the benefit of doubt. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the pickup vehicle involved in the fatal accident. Witness testimony and investigation records revealed that the vehicle causing the accident was actually the accused's motorcycle, not a pickup truck as initially reported. Multiple witnesses either contradicted the prosecution narrative or refused to testify. The investigation officer himself admitted during cross-examination that no pickup vehicle was involved—the vehicle was a motorcycle (RJ 18 PS 4664). Without establishing the accused as the vehicle operator at the time of the accident, the prosecution could not prove the requisite elements of rash/negligent driving causing death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Anil Kumar (Case 21/2024) Court Decision: The Village Court of Navalgadh acquitted defendant Anil Kumar of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence), granting him the benefit of doubt. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the pickup vehicle involved in the fatal accident. Witness testimony and investigation records revealed that the vehicle causing the accident was actually the accused's motorcycle, not a pickup truck as initially reported. Multiple witnesses either contradicted the prosecution narrative or refused to testify. The investigation officer himself admitted during cross-examination that no pickup vehicle was involved—the vehicle was a motorcycle (RJ 18 PS 4664). Without establishing the accused as the vehicle operator at the time of the accident, the prosecution could not prove the requisite elements of rash/negligent driving causing death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gram Nayayalaya Nawalgarh All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case