State vs Dolatram Advocate - Shri Vikas Bhakar — 116/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 22nd April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJJH130002402016
Filing Number
219/2016
Filing Date
27-Aug-2015
Registration No
116/2026
Registration Date
27-Aug-2015
Court
ACJM Udaipurwati
Judge
1-Acjm
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
164
Police Station
Udaipurwati
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. APP 1st
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dolatram Advocate - Shri Vikas Bhakar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
copy of JudgementView PDF
Summary of Case 116/2026 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan Parties: State vs. Dolatram (accused); Petitioner: Krishnadebi (complainant) Charges: IPC Sections 498A (cruelty to married woman) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) Decision (22.04.2026): The court acquitted the accused under Section 406 IPC but convicted him under Section 498A IPC. The accused was granted probation under the Probation of Offenders Act instead of imprisonment, conditioned on good behavior for two years with a bond of ₹10,000 and personal surety. He was ordered to pay ₹25,000 compensation to the complainant. Key Finding: While the court found insufficient evidence of criminal breach of trust regarding dowry items, it established that the accused subjected the complainant to cruelty regarding her inability to bear children, causing her mental and physical harassment during their 4-year marriage (2010-2014). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Disposed
Acjm
-
21-Apr-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Acjm
-
16-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Acjm
-
10-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Acjm
-
30-Mar-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Acjm
-
17-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Acjm
-
12-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
06-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
25-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
18-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
29-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
19-Dec-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Acjm
-
28-Nov-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Acjm
-
15-Nov-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Acjm
-
15-Oct-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Acjm
-
12-Sep-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Acjm
-
28-Aug-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Acjm
-
02-Aug-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Acjm
-
14-Jul-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Acjm
-
03-Jul-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Acjm
-
28-May-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Acjm
-
11-Apr-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Acjm
-
19-Feb-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Acjm
-
24-Jan-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Acjm
-
04-Dec-2024
Hearing arguments on Charge
Acjm
-
04-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
25-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
15-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
04-Mar-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
04-Jan-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
01-Nov-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
03-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
11-Jul-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
11-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
10-Mar-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
13-Jan-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
14-Oct-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
06-Aug-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
10-Jun-2022
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
17-May-2022
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
18-Apr-2022
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
19-Feb-2022
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
17-Nov-2021
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
17-Sep-2021
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
17-Jul-2021
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
18-May-2021
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
16-Mar-2021
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
09-Feb-2021
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
21-Nov-2020
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
09-Oct-2020
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
16-Jul-2020
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
30-Apr-2020
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
14-Feb-2020
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
21-Nov-2019
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
19-Oct-2019
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
17-Jul-2019
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
04-May-2019
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
15-Mar-2019
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
20-Nov-2018
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
27-Sep-2018
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
29-Jun-2018
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
30-Mar-2018
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
20-Feb-2018
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
25-Nov-2017
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
10-Jul-2017
Awaiting Warrant
Acjm
-
25-May-2017
Awaiting Warrant
Acjm
-
18-Feb-2017
Awaiting Warrant
Acjm
-
28-Nov-2016
Awaiting Warrant
Acjm
-
29-Aug-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Aug-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 116/2026
Summary of Case 116/2026 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan Parties: State vs. Dolatram (accused); Petitioner: Krishnadebi (complainant) Charges: IPC Sections 498A (cruelty to married woman) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) Decision (22.04.2026): The court acquitted the accused under Section 406 IPC but convicted him under Section 498A IPC. The accused was granted probation under the Probation of Offenders Act instead of imprisonment, conditioned on good behavior for two years with a bond of ₹10,000 and personal surety. He was ordered to pay ₹25,000 compensation to the complainant. Key Finding: While the court found insufficient evidence of criminal breach of trust regarding dowry items, it established that the accused subjected the complainant to cruelty regarding her inability to bear children, causing her mental and physical harassment during their 4-year marriage (2010-2014). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts