Sunita vs Unknown Advocate - UNAVAILABLE — 436/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420, 406. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 16th March 2026.
Final Report - FR
CNR: RJJH070022542022
Filing Number
2252/2022
Filing Date
22-12-2022
Registration No
436/2022
Registration Date
22-12-2022
Court
ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ
Judge
2-ACJM
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed otherwise
FIR Details
FIR Number
66
Police Station
KHETRI NAGAR
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunita
Adv. SH. HAWA SINGH BABERWAL
Respondent(s)
Unknown Advocate - UNAVAILABLE
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ACJM
Disposed
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant |
| 05-02-2026 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant |
| 04-12-2025 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant |
| 04-11-2025 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the final objection filed by petitioner Sunita in a criminal case (FIR 66/2021) involving charges under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, and 120B. The dismissal was based on the investigation officer's conclusion that the case was "completely false" (adum vakw jhooth), which the court found justified given the absence of any credible evidence on record to contradict this finding and the petitioner's repeated failure to file a proper rejoinder despite multiple opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the final objection filed by petitioner Sunita in a criminal case (FIR 66/2021) involving charges under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, and 120B. The dismissal was based on the investigation officer's conclusion that the case was "completely false" (adum vakw jhooth), which the court found justified given the absence of any credible evidence on record to contradict this finding and the petitioner's repeated failure to file a proper rejoinder despite multiple opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts