Rohitash vs Unknown Advocate - UNAVAILABLE — 432/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 16th March 2026.
Final Report - FR
CNR: RJJH070022502022
Filing Number
2248/2022
Filing Date
22-Dec-2022
Registration No
432/2022
Registration Date
22-Dec-2022
Court
ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ
Judge
2-Acjm
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed otherwise
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
238
Police Station
KHETRI NAGAR
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rohitash
Adv. SH. HAWA SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Unknown Advocate - UNAVAILABLE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the final report in Case 432/2022 against petitioner Rohitash, finding it to be "completely baseless" (adam vakw jhooth). The petitioner's advocate remained absent despite multiple opportunities to present the complaint, and the investigation officer's conclusions lacked evidentiary support. The original case diary was returned to the concerned police station. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Acjm
-
12-Mar-2026
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
05-Feb-2026
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
04-Dec-2025
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
04-Nov-2025
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
04-Aug-2025
Compliance
Acjm
-
24-Mar-2025
Compliance
Acjm
-
17-Dec-2024
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
03-Sep-2024
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
18-Jul-2024
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
07-May-2024
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
05-Dec-2023
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
19-Sep-2023
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
11-May-2023
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
08-Feb-2023
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
18-Jan-2023
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Acjm
-
09-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 432/2022
The court dismissed the final report in Case 432/2022 against petitioner Rohitash, finding it to be "completely baseless" (adam vakw jhooth). The petitioner's advocate remained absent despite multiple opportunities to present the complaint, and the investigation officer's conclusions lacked evidentiary support. The original case diary was returned to the concerned police station. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts