Rampat vs unknown Advocate - UNAVAILABLE — 342/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,406,471,120b. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 16th March 2026.
Final Report - FR
CNR: RJJH070019452022
Filing Number
1943/2022
Filing Date
11-Nov-2022
Registration No
342/2022
Registration Date
11-Nov-2022
Court
ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ
Judge
2-Acjm
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed otherwise
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
191
Police Station
KHETRI NAGAR
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rampat
Adv. SH. HAWA SINGH BABERWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.unknown Advocate - UNAVAILABLE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 435/2022 Summary The court found the case to be "completely baseless" (Aadm Vakw Jhooth) after the accused failed to submit a rebuttal statement despite multiple opportunities, and investigation revealed no evidence supporting the charges under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, and 120B. The final report was accepted, the case dismissed, and the file returned to the concerned police station for closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Acjm
-
12-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
05-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
04-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
04-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
04-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
24-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
17-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
03-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
18-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
21-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
05-Mar-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
21-Nov-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
12-Sep-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
20-Jun-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
06-Apr-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
21-Nov-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
11-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 342/2022
Case 435/2022 Summary The court found the case to be "completely baseless" (Aadm Vakw Jhooth) after the accused failed to submit a rebuttal statement despite multiple opportunities, and investigation revealed no evidence supporting the charges under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, and 120B. The final report was accepted, the case dismissed, and the file returned to the concerned police station for closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts