Rajbala vs unknown Advocate - UNAVAILABLE — 341/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,471,120b. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 16th March 2026.
Final Report - FR
CNR: RJJH070019442022
Filing Number
1942/2022
Filing Date
11-Nov-2022
Registration No
341/2022
Registration Date
11-Nov-2022
Court
ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ
Judge
2-Acjm
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed otherwise
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
235
Police Station
KHETRI NAGAR
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajbala
Adv. UNAVAILABLE
Respondent(s)
-
1.unknown Advocate - UNAVAILABLE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the final report in criminal case 341/2022 against petitioner Rajbala, finding it to be "wholly false" ("Adm Vakw Jhooth"). The judgment noted that despite multiple opportunities, the petitioner's advocate failed to file a dissent petition against the investigation officer's conclusion, and the court found no basis in the evidence to support the investigation findings, thereby accepting the final report as baseless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Acjm
-
12-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
05-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
04-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
04-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
04-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
24-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
17-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
03-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
18-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
07-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
05-Dec-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
19-Sep-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
11-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
09-Feb-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
21-Nov-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
11-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 341/2022
The court dismissed the final report in criminal case 341/2022 against petitioner Rajbala, finding it to be "wholly false" ("Adm Vakw Jhooth"). The judgment noted that despite multiple opportunities, the petitioner's advocate failed to file a dissent petition against the investigation officer's conclusion, and the court found no basis in the evidence to support the investigation findings, thereby accepting the final report as baseless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts