Rajasthan Government vs CHUNNILAL Advocate - SH. MAHIPAL DORATA — 61/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 465,420. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 28th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJJH070017402018
Filing Number
1732/2018
Filing Date
14-12-2018
Registration No
61/2019
Registration Date
19-01-2019
Court
ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ
Judge
3-JM
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation
FIR Details
FIR Number
159
Police Station
KHETRI NAGAR
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajasthan Government
Adv. APP1
Respondent(s)
CHUNNILAL Advocate - SH. MAHIPAL DORATA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JM
Disposed
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 19-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 10-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 61/2019 Court Decision (March 28, 2026): The Judicial Magistrate of Khetdi found accused Chunnilal (19 years old) guilty under IPC Section 465 (forgery) and acquitted him under Section 3/25 Arms Act and Section 420 IPC. Instead of direct imprisonment, the court granted him probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, imposing bail conditions of ₹10,000 each with one year supervision, plus ₹2,000 prosecution costs—considering his youth, clean record, and first offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 61/2019 Court Decision (March 28, 2026): The Judicial Magistrate of Khetdi found accused Chunnilal (19 years old) guilty under IPC Section 465 (forgery) and acquitted him under Section 3/25 Arms Act and Section 420 IPC. Instead of direct imprisonment, the court granted him probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, imposing bail conditions of ₹10,000 each with one year supervision, plus ₹2,000 prosecution costs—considering his youth, clean record, and first offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts