Rajasthan Government vs CHUNNILAL Advocate - SH. MAHIPAL DORATA — 61/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 465,420. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJJH070017402018

Filing Number

1732/2018

Filing Date

14-Dec-2018

Registration No

61/2019

Registration Date

19-Jan-2019

Court

ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ

Judge

3-Jm

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

159

Police Station

KHETRI NAGAR

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 465,420
Arms Act Section 3,25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajasthan Government

    Adv. APP1

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHUNNILAL Advocate - SH. MAHIPAL DORATA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Summary of Case 61/2019 Court Decision (March 28, 2026): The Judicial Magistrate of Khetdi found accused Chunnilal (19 years old) guilty under IPC Section 465 (forgery) and acquitted him under Section 3/25 Arms Act and Section 420 IPC. Instead of direct imprisonment, the court granted him probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, imposing bail conditions of ₹10,000 each with one year supervision, plus ₹2,000 prosecution costs—considering his youth, clean record, and first offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Jm

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Jm

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Jm

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 19-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 16-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 09-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 27-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 21-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 03-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 17-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 29-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 26-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 06-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 20-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 19-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 09-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 14-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 17-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 15-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  26. 11-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  27. 07-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  28. 20-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 08-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  30. 27-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  31. 16-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  32. 16-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  33. 24-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 16-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  35. 16-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  36. 07-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  37. 07-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  38. 07-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  39. 18-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  40. 04-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  41. 23-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  42. 05-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  43. 29-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  44. 17-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  45. 31-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  46. 25-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

  47. 11-Jan-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  48. 12-Dec-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  49. 21-Oct-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  50. 15-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  51. 10-Jun-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  52. 22-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  53. 01-Feb-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  54. 19-Nov-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  55. 18-Sep-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  56. 14-Sep-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  57. 22-Jul-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  58. 30-May-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  59. 13-Mar-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  60. 22-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 14-Dec-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 61/2019 Court Decision (March 28, 2026): The Judicial Magistrate of Khetdi found accused Chunnilal (19 years old) guilty under IPC Section 465 (forgery) and acquitted him under Section 3/25 Arms Act and Section 420 IPC. Instead of direct imprisonment, the court granted him probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, imposing bail conditions of ₹10,000 each with one year supervision, plus ₹2,000 prosecution costs—considering his youth, clean record, and first offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case