Asha gurjar vs unkowon Advocate - NOT AVAIBLE — 179/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),3(5),329(4),307,351(2),352. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report - FR

CNR: RJJH070011962025

Filing Number

1194/2025

Filing Date

24-Sep-2025

Registration No

179/2025

Registration Date

24-Sep-2025

Court

ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ

Judge

2-Acjm

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

73

Police Station

P.S Babai

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),3(5),329(4),307,351(2),352

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Asha gurjar

    Adv. nil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.unkowon Advocate - NOT AVAIBLE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the case as "completely false" (abadh bakhu jhooth) under IPC Sections 351(2) and 352. Petitioner Asha Devi's complaint alleged assault and threats by family members over a pension dispute, but the investigating officer concluded that the parties belong to the same family, no actual assault occurred on the petitioner's field, and the entire account was fabricated. The court accepted the investigation findings and ordered return of the case diary to the police station with the file to be marked as disposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  5. 28-Mar-2026

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  8. 12-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 24-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 179/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the case as "completely false" (abadh bakhu jhooth) under IPC Sections 351(2) and 352. Petitioner Asha Devi's complaint alleged assault and threats by family members over a pension dispute, but the investigating officer concluded that the parties belong to the same family, no actual assault occurred on the petitioner's field, and the entire account was fabricated. The court accepted the investigation findings and ordered return of the case diary to the police station with the file to be marked as disposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case