Rajasthan Government vs SANDEEP Advocate - SUBHASH DADHICH — 461/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJJH070007712019

Filing Number

761/2019

Filing Date

10-Jul-2019

Registration No

461/2019

Registration Date

10-Jul-2019

Court

ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ

Judge

3-Jm

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

67

Police Station

KHETRI NAGAR

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajasthan Government

    Adv. APP2

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANDEEP Advocate - SUBHASH DADHICH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Summary of Case 461/2019 The accused, Sandeep Kumar, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty by husband/relatives) and 406 (criminal breach of trust/dowry). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused demanded dowry or subjected the complainant to cruelty. Key factors: no medical evidence of abuse, no specific details about dowry demands, the complainant admittedly left the matrimonial home voluntarily, and witnesses provided inconsistent accounts based on the complainant's statements rather than independent observations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Jm

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 16-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 05-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 21-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 14-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 04-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 16-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 14-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 13-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 25-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 09-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 01-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 28-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 23-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 27-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 11-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 30-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  26. 23-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  27. 19-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  28. 04-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 17-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  30. 24-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  31. 13-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  32. 08-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  33. 21-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 07-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  35. 17-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  36. 05-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  37. 05-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  38. 12-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  39. 09-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  40. 07-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  41. 07-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  42. 30-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  43. 06-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  44. 19-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  45. 11-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  46. 20-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  47. 13-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  48. 23-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  49. 03-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  50. 26-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  51. 10-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  52. 06-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  53. 21-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  54. 12-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  55. 11-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  56. 13-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  57. 28-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  58. 15-Apr-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

  59. 02-Feb-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  60. 16-Jan-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  61. 12-Dec-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  62. 18-Nov-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  63. 07-Oct-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  64. 26-Aug-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  65. 03-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  66. 29-May-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  67. 07-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  68. 11-Feb-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  69. 05-Dec-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  70. 27-Sep-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  71. 05-Sep-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  72. 10-Jul-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 461/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 461/2019 The accused, Sandeep Kumar, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty by husband/relatives) and 406 (criminal breach of trust/dowry). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused demanded dowry or subjected the complainant to cruelty. Key factors: no medical evidence of abuse, no specific details about dowry demands, the complainant admittedly left the matrimonial home voluntarily, and witnesses provided inconsistent accounts based on the complainant's statements rather than independent observations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case