Rajasthan Government vs SANDEEP Advocate - SUBHASH DADHICH — 461/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJJH070007712019
Filing Number
761/2019
Filing Date
10-07-2019
Registration No
461/2019
Registration Date
10-07-2019
Court
ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ
Judge
3-JM
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
67
Police Station
KHETRI NAGAR
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajasthan Government
Adv. APP2
Respondent(s)
SANDEEP Advocate - SUBHASH DADHICH
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JM
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 24-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 19-02-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 461/2019 The accused, Sandeep Kumar, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty by husband/relatives) and 406 (criminal breach of trust/dowry). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused demanded dowry or subjected the complainant to cruelty. Key factors: no medical evidence of abuse, no specific details about dowry demands, the complainant admittedly left the matrimonial home voluntarily, and witnesses provided inconsistent accounts based on the complainant's statements rather than independent observations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 461/2019 The accused, Sandeep Kumar, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty by husband/relatives) and 406 (criminal breach of trust/dowry). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused demanded dowry or subjected the complainant to cruelty. Key factors: no medical evidence of abuse, no specific details about dowry demands, the complainant admittedly left the matrimonial home voluntarily, and witnesses provided inconsistent accounts based on the complainant's statements rather than independent observations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts