NILAM JAGIR vs SANDEEP KUMAR Advocate - SUBHASH DADHICH — 129/2019
Case under The Protaction of Women Against Domestic Violence Act 2005 Section 12,23. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 28th March 2026.
Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC
CNR: RJJH070005392019
Filing Number
532/2019
Filing Date
28-May-2019
Registration No
129/2019
Registration Date
28-May-2019
Court
ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ
Judge
3-Jm
Decision Date
28-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NILAM JAGIR
Adv. SH. GOPICHAND GURJAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANDEEP KUMAR Advocate - SUBHASH DADHICH
-
2.BHIKHARAM
-
3.SAMPATI DEVI
-
4.KANCHAN
-
5.PINKI
-
6.PRIAYNKA
-
7.VIJENDRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Mar-2026
Copy of document.View PDF
Case Summary: 129/2019 Court Decision (28.03.2026): The Judicial Magistrate granted a domestic violence protection order under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in favor of petitioner Nilam Jagir against respondents Sandeep Kumar and family members. The court found credible evidence of cruelty, physical abuse, and harassment over dowry demands, determining that the respondent husband subjected the petitioner to domestic violence including beatings, verbal abuse, and abandonment. The court ordered the respondents to cease domestic violence, pay ₹6,500 monthly maintenance from 17.08.2023, and awarded ₹1,00,000 compensation for physical and mental injury suffered by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jm
-
24-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Jm
-
12-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Jm
-
19-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Jm
-
10-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
29-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
16-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
05-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
21-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
14-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
04-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
16-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
14-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
13-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
25-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
09-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
01-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
01-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
28-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
23-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
27-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
11-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
30-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
14-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
23-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
19-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
04-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
17-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
24-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
13-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
08-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
21-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
07-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
17-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
05-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
05-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
12-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
09-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
07-Feb-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
07-Dec-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
30-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
06-Sep-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
19-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
11-Jul-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
20-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
13-Apr-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
19-Jan-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
20-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
20-Oct-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
19-Sep-2022
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
27-Jul-2022
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
16-Jun-2022
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
09-May-2022
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
29-Mar-2022
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
12-Jan-2022
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
15-Dec-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
11-Dec-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
23-Nov-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
16-Nov-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
11-Sep-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
13-Aug-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
28-May-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
15-Apr-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
-
22-Mar-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
10-Mar-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
02-Feb-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
16-Jan-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
05-Jan-2021
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
04-Dec-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
27-Oct-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
09-Oct-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
24-Aug-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
25-Jun-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
21-May-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
30-Mar-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
24-Feb-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
27-Jan-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
20-Jan-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
08-Jan-2020
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
10-Dec-2019
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
27-Nov-2019
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
31-Oct-2019
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
13-Sep-2019
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
16-Aug-2019
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Jm
-
09-Jul-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-May-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 129/2019
Case Summary: 129/2019 Court Decision (28.03.2026): The Judicial Magistrate granted a domestic violence protection order under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in favor of petitioner Nilam Jagir against respondents Sandeep Kumar and family members. The court found credible evidence of cruelty, physical abuse, and harassment over dowry demands, determining that the respondent husband subjected the petitioner to domestic violence including beatings, verbal abuse, and abandonment. The court ordered the respondents to cease domestic violence, pay ₹6,500 monthly maintenance from 17.08.2023, and awarded ₹1,00,000 compensation for physical and mental injury suffered by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts