Rajasthan Government vs SHEKHAR Advocate - SH. MAHIPAL DORATA — 230/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 02nd April 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJJH070003562020

Case disposed

Filing Number

354/2020

Filing Date

12-03-2020

Registration No

230/2020

Registration Date

12-03-2020

Court

ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ

Judge

3-JM

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

9

Police Station

KHETRI NAGAR

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406

Petitioner(s)

Rajasthan Government

Adv. APP2

Respondent(s)

SHEKHAR Advocate - SH. MAHIPAL DORATA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-JM

02-04-2026

Restored

02-04-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Service of Summons/bailable warrant

08-01-2026

Service of Summons/bailable warrant

21-11-2025

Service of Summons/bailable warrant

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Copy of document.

Case Summary: 230/2020 Court Decision: The accused Shekhar was acquitted under IPC Section 498A (cruelty) due to insufficient evidence, though he was previously convicted under Section 406 (criminal breach of trust) via plea compromise. The prosecution failed to prove dowry harassment charges against the accused beyond reasonable doubt, as all witnesses—including the complainant and her family members—testified that no demands for dowry or harassment occurred after the marriage on 06.07.2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 230/2020 Court Decision: The accused Shekhar was acquitted under IPC Section 498A (cruelty) due to insufficient evidence, though he was previously convicted under Section 406 (criminal breach of trust) via plea compromise. The prosecution failed to prove dowry harassment charges against the accused beyond reasonable doubt, as all witnesses—including the complainant and her family members—testified that no demands for dowry or harassment occurred after the marriage on 06.07.2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case