State vs RAJINDER Advocate - SH. MAHIPAL DORATA — 118/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJJH070002462022

Filing Number

245/2022

Filing Date

24-Feb-2022

Registration No

118/2022

Registration Date

24-Feb-2022

Court

ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ

Judge

2-Acjm

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

589

Police Station

KHETRI

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 354

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. PP1

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJINDER Advocate - SH. MAHIPAL DORATA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Rajinder Urfz Monnu (118/2022) Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Rajendra Urfz Monnu of charges under IPC Section 354(d) (stalking) due to lack of evidence. The complainant (victim) and key witnesses were found to be hostile to the prosecution case, with their testimony contradicting the FIR allegations of phone harassment, threats to circulate obscene photos, and repeated stalking. Key Reasoning: Despite the written FIR detailing incidents from August 6, 2021, the complainant testified under oath that no harassment occurred, and corroborating witnesses similarly denied the alleged acts. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  7. 20-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  8. 21-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  9. 02-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  10. 23-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  11. 31-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  12. 04-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  13. 01-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  14. 04-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  15. 24-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  16. 21-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  17. 01-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 13-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 18-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 24-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 08-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 24-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 118/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Rajinder Urfz Monnu (118/2022) Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Rajendra Urfz Monnu of charges under IPC Section 354(d) (stalking) due to lack of evidence. The complainant (victim) and key witnesses were found to be hostile to the prosecution case, with their testimony contradicting the FIR allegations of phone harassment, threats to circulate obscene photos, and repeated stalking. Key Reasoning: Despite the written FIR detailing incidents from August 6, 2021, the complainant testified under oath that no harassment occurred, and corroborating witnesses similarly denied the alleged acts. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case