Rajasthan Government vs LALCHAND AND ORS Advocate - SH. SHISRAM SAINI — 112/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,325,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJJH070001772019

Filing Number

174/2019

Filing Date

08-Feb-2019

Registration No

112/2019

Registration Date

08-Feb-2019

Court

ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ

Judge

3-Jm

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

2

Police Station

KHETRI

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,325,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajasthan Government

    Adv. APP1

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LALCHAND AND ORS Advocate - SH. SHISRAM SAINI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Case Summary: Rajasthan State v. Lalchand and Others (Case 112/2019) Decision: The court acquitted both accused Lalchand (age 60) and Bala Devi (age 50) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 341, and 325/34 (wrongful restraint, voluntary causing hurt, and causing grievous hurt). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the alleged offenses. Despite the complainant (Vinod Kumar, a police officer) testifying about being assaulted on December 31, 2018, the court noted critical evidentiary gaps: no medical examination corroborated serious injuries, independent eyewitnesses recanted their initial statements or were deemed hostile, and inconsistencies in the complaint undermined credibility. The court determined sufficient doubt existed regarding the accused's involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Jm

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Restored

    Jm

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Jm

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Jm

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Jm

  9. 07-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Jm

  10. 05-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 16-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 04-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 31-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 26-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 27-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 19-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 19-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 10-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 16-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 15-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 19-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 23-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 28-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 05-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 04-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  26. 11-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  27. 04-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  28. 08-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 04-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  30. 17-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  31. 25-Jun-2021

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  32. 20-Mar-2021

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Jm

  33. 16-Jan-2021

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Acjm

  34. 01-Oct-2020

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Acjm

  35. 13-Jul-2020

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Acjm

  36. 08-Jun-2020

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Acjm

  37. 20-Apr-2020

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Acjm

  38. 09-Jan-2020

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Acjm

  39. 17-Oct-2019

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Acjm

  40. 11-Jul-2019

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Acjm

  41. 25-Apr-2019

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  42. 01-Apr-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 08-Feb-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Rajasthan State v. Lalchand and Others (Case 112/2019) Decision: The court acquitted both accused Lalchand (age 60) and Bala Devi (age 50) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 341, and 325/34 (wrongful restraint, voluntary causing hurt, and causing grievous hurt). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the alleged offenses. Despite the complainant (Vinod Kumar, a police officer) testifying about being assaulted on December 31, 2018, the court noted critical evidentiary gaps: no medical examination corroborated serious injuries, independent eyewitnesses recanted their initial statements or were deemed hostile, and inconsistencies in the complaint undermined credibility. The court determined sufficient doubt existed regarding the accused's involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case