Rajasthan Government vs LALCHAND AND ORS Advocate - SH. SHISRAM SAINI — 112/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,325,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 19th March 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJJH070001772019

Case disposed

Filing Number

174/2019

Filing Date

08-02-2019

Registration No

112/2019

Registration Date

08-02-2019

Court

ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ

Judge

3-JM

Decision Date

19th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

2

Police Station

KHETRI

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,325,34

Petitioner(s)

Rajasthan Government

Adv. APP1

Respondent(s)

LALCHAND AND ORS Advocate - SH. SHISRAM SAINI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-JM

19-03-2026

Orders

19-03-2026

Restored

19-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Defence Evidence

12-03-2026

Defence Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

19-03-2026
Copy of document.

Case Summary: Rajasthan State v. Lalchand and Others (Case 112/2019) Decision: The court acquitted both accused Lalchand (age 60) and Bala Devi (age 50) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 341, and 325/34 (wrongful restraint, voluntary causing hurt, and causing grievous hurt). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the alleged offenses. Despite the complainant (Vinod Kumar, a police officer) testifying about being assaulted on December 31, 2018, the court noted critical evidentiary gaps: no medical examination corroborated serious injuries, independent eyewitnesses recanted their initial statements or were deemed hostile, and inconsistencies in the complaint undermined credibility. The court determined sufficient doubt existed regarding the accused's involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Rajasthan State v. Lalchand and Others (Case 112/2019) Decision: The court acquitted both accused Lalchand (age 60) and Bala Devi (age 50) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 341, and 325/34 (wrongful restraint, voluntary causing hurt, and causing grievous hurt). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the alleged offenses. Despite the complainant (Vinod Kumar, a police officer) testifying about being assaulted on December 31, 2018, the court noted critical evidentiary gaps: no medical examination corroborated serious injuries, independent eyewitnesses recanted their initial statements or were deemed hostile, and inconsistencies in the complaint undermined credibility. The court determined sufficient doubt existed regarding the accused's involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ACJM MJM Khetri Taluka HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case