JAGDISH vs SHRIRAM AND ORS Advocate - SH. SUBASH KUMAWAT — 78/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 18th April 2026.
Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL
CNR: RJJH060012932019
Filing Number
534/2019
Filing Date
21-Nov-2019
Registration No
78/2019
Registration Date
21-Nov-2019
Court
ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ
Judge
1-ADJ I
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAGDISH
Adv. SH. PRAVEEN KUMAR SAROLIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRIRAM AND ORS Advocate - SH. SUBASH KUMAWAT
-
2.NAGARPALIKA KHETRI
-
3.ADHAYKSH NAGARPALIKA KHETRI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary: Jagdish v. Shriram and Others (Case 78/2019) The District Court dismissed Jagdish's appeal against a civil judgment regarding a disputed roadway in Ward 20, Khetri. Jagdish claimed defendant Shriram illegally obstructed a 15-foot access road (13 feet on one side) by constructing a pit, platform, and wall, reducing it to 6-7 feet. The court found that both Jagdish and Shriram had independently blocked the road with their own barriers, so Shriram alone was not responsible for the obstruction. The appeal was rejected as Jagdish failed to prove the encroachment claims against the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
ADJ I
-
16-Apr-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
10-Apr-2026
Misc. DocumentsView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
06-Apr-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
30-Mar-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
25-Mar-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
19-Mar-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
12-Mar-2026
Misc. DocumentsView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
17-Feb-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
30-Jan-2026
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
28-Nov-2025
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
13-Oct-2025
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
07-Aug-2025
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
16-May-2025
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
17-Apr-2025
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
24-Feb-2025
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
09-Dec-2024
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
25-Oct-2024
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
16-Aug-2024
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
15-Mar-2024
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
08-Dec-2023
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
18-Sep-2023
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
19-May-2023
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
02-Feb-2023
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
01-Dec-2022
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
04-Aug-2022
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
11-Apr-2022
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ I
-
14-Dec-2021
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ I
-
10-Aug-2021
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ I
-
09-Aug-2021
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ I
-
26-Apr-2021
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ I
-
06-Mar-2021
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ
-
29-Jan-2021
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ
-
28-Jan-2021
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ
-
02-Dec-2020
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ
-
29-Oct-2020
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ
-
22-Jul-2020
Written Statement
ADJ
-
02-Jul-2020
Written Statement
ADJ
-
26-May-2020
Written Statement
ADJ
-
05-May-2020
Written Statement
ADJ
-
14-Feb-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Nov-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 78/2019
Summary: Jagdish v. Shriram and Others (Case 78/2019) The District Court dismissed Jagdish's appeal against a civil judgment regarding a disputed roadway in Ward 20, Khetri. Jagdish claimed defendant Shriram illegally obstructed a 15-foot access road (13 feet on one side) by constructing a pit, platform, and wall, reducing it to 6-7 feet. The court found that both Jagdish and Shriram had independently blocked the road with their own barriers, so Shriram alone was not responsible for the obstruction. The appeal was rejected as Jagdish failed to prove the encroachment claims against the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts