GHISARAM vs AMAR SINGH AND ORS Advocate - SH. HAWA SINGH BABERWAL — 75/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 12th March 2026.
Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL
CNR: RJJH060012072019
Filing Number
499/2019
Filing Date
30-10-2019
Registration No
75/2019
Registration Date
18-11-2019
Court
ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ
Judge
1-ADJ I
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GHISARAM
Adv. SH. GAJANAND YADAV
Respondent(s)
AMAR SINGH AND ORS Advocate - SH. HAWA SINGH BABERWAL
SURENDRA
KALURAM
SURESH KUMAR
RATIRAM
RAMSINGH
LALSINGH
KRISHAN KUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ I
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 13-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 09-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Case 75/2019 - Ghisaram v. Amar Singh The appellate court dismissed Ghisaram's appeal against a lower court's injunction order, upholding the trial court's decision. The dispute involved a disputed land parcel in Khetdi village, where Ghisaram claimed ownership and sought to prevent respondents from excavating soil that allegedly caused damage to his property wall and buildings. The court found that: (1) Ghisaram failed to establish legal possession of the contested land, which was classified as communal pasture land (gaira-muekin jodh), not private property; (2) respondents legitimately cultivated adjacent agricultural land and had authority to level it; and (3) without valid declaratory relief establishing ownership, the injunction could not be sustained. The appeal was rejected with each party bearing its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 75/2019 - Ghisaram v. Amar Singh The appellate court dismissed Ghisaram's appeal against a lower court's injunction order, upholding the trial court's decision. The dispute involved a disputed land parcel in Khetdi village, where Ghisaram claimed ownership and sought to prevent respondents from excavating soil that allegedly caused damage to his property wall and buildings. The court found that: (1) Ghisaram failed to establish legal possession of the contested land, which was classified as communal pasture land (gaira-muekin jodh), not private property; (2) respondents legitimately cultivated adjacent agricultural land and had authority to level it; and (3) without valid declaratory relief establishing ownership, the injunction could not be sustained. The appeal was rejected with each party bearing its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts