GHISARAM vs AMAR SINGH AND ORS Advocate - SH. HAWA SINGH BABERWAL — 75/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL

CNR: RJJH060012072019

Filing Number

499/2019

Filing Date

30-Oct-2019

Registration No

75/2019

Registration Date

18-Nov-2019

Court

ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ

Judge

1-ADJ I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GHISARAM

    Adv. SH. GAJANAND YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMAR SINGH AND ORS Advocate - SH. HAWA SINGH BABERWAL

  2. 2.SURENDRA

  3. 3.KALURAM

  4. 4.SURESH KUMAR

  5. 5.RATIRAM

  6. 6.RAMSINGH

  7. 7.LALSINGH

  8. 8.KRISHAN KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary: Case 75/2019 - Ghisaram v. Amar Singh The appellate court dismissed Ghisaram's appeal against a lower court's injunction order, upholding the trial court's decision. The dispute involved a disputed land parcel in Khetdi village, where Ghisaram claimed ownership and sought to prevent respondents from excavating soil that allegedly caused damage to his property wall and buildings. The court found that: (1) Ghisaram failed to establish legal possession of the contested land, which was classified as communal pasture land (gaira-muekin jodh), not private property; (2) respondents legitimately cultivated adjacent agricultural land and had authority to level it; and (3) without valid declaratory relief establishing ownership, the injunction could not be sustained. The appeal was rejected with each party bearing its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  9. 31-Jan-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  10. 19-Jan-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  11. 24-Nov-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  12. 28-Oct-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  13. 24-Oct-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  14. 11-Aug-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  15. 14-Jul-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  16. 12-May-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  17. 21-Apr-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  18. 24-Mar-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  19. 17-Feb-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  20. 16-Dec-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  21. 04-Nov-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  22. 09-Sep-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  23. 12-Aug-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  24. 18-Mar-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  25. 20-Nov-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  26. 11-Sep-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  27. 17-Jul-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  28. 13-Feb-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  29. 18-Oct-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  30. 04-Jul-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  31. 28-May-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  32. 21-Mar-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  33. 29-Nov-2021

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  34. 10-Aug-2021

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  35. 09-Aug-2021

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  36. 26-Apr-2021

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ I

  37. 02-Feb-2021

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ

  38. 10-Nov-2020

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ

  39. 31-Jul-2020

    Written Statement

    ADJ

  40. 21-May-2020

    Written Statement

    ADJ

  41. 24-Feb-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 30-Oct-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 75/2019 - Ghisaram v. Amar Singh The appellate court dismissed Ghisaram's appeal against a lower court's injunction order, upholding the trial court's decision. The dispute involved a disputed land parcel in Khetdi village, where Ghisaram claimed ownership and sought to prevent respondents from excavating soil that allegedly caused damage to his property wall and buildings. The court found that: (1) Ghisaram failed to establish legal possession of the contested land, which was classified as communal pasture land (gaira-muekin jodh), not private property; (2) respondents legitimately cultivated adjacent agricultural land and had authority to level it; and (3) without valid declaratory relief establishing ownership, the injunction could not be sustained. The appeal was rejected with each party bearing its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case