RADHAYSHYAM vs RAMCHANDER AND ORS Advocate - SH. NARPAL SINGH YADAV — 57/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 12th March 2026.
Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL
CNR: RJJH060010112019
Filing Number
422/2019
Filing Date
12-Sep-2019
Registration No
57/2019
Registration Date
12-Sep-2019
Court
ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ
Judge
1-ADJ I
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RADHAYSHYAM
Adv. SH. MUKESH KUMAR SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMCHANDER AND ORS Advocate - SH. NARPAL SINGH YADAV
-
2.PREM DEVI
-
3.RAJVEER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: Civil Regular Appeal 57/2019 Court: District Court, Khetri, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan Parties: Radhayshyam (Appellant) v. Ramchander and Others (Respondents) Decision Date: March 12, 2026 Summary The appellate court dismissed Radhayshyam's appeal against the lower court's rejection of his petition for permanent injunction and declaratory relief regarding disputed agricultural land in village Singhana. The court found that Radhayshyam failed to prove clear ownership/possession of the disputed property through credible documentary or oral evidence. His statement regarding the extent and boundaries of the land was self-contradictory (claiming both 1,430 and 1,750 square yards). The court upheld the trial judge's decision, applying the principle that a plaintiff disputing title must establish ownership through proper evidence, and cannot obtain injunction without proving valid possession or title. The appeal was dismissed with each party bearing its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ I
-
09-Mar-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
25-Feb-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
17-Feb-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
12-Feb-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
09-Feb-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
05-Feb-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
31-Jan-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
17-Jan-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
20-Dec-2025
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
15-Nov-2025
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
01-Nov-2025
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
20-Sep-2025
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
02-Aug-2025
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
05-Jul-2025
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
17-May-2025
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
29-Mar-2025
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
18-Jan-2025
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
07-Dec-2024
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
19-Oct-2024
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
03-Aug-2024
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
18-May-2024
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
17-Feb-2024
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
07-Nov-2023
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
08-Aug-2023
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
25-Apr-2023
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
07-Jan-2023
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
03-Sep-2022
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ I
-
02-Jul-2022
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ I
-
05-Mar-2022
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ I
-
20-Nov-2021
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ I
-
17-Jul-2021
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ I
-
03-Apr-2021
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
-
20-Feb-2021
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ
-
21-Nov-2020
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ
-
17-Nov-2020
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ
-
05-Sep-2020
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ
-
07-Jul-2020
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ
-
30-May-2020
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ
-
29-Feb-2020
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ
-
09-Jan-2020
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ
-
22-Oct-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Sep-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 57/2019
Case Summary: Civil Regular Appeal 57/2019 Court: District Court, Khetri, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan Parties: Radhayshyam (Appellant) v. Ramchander and Others (Respondents) Decision Date: March 12, 2026 Summary The appellate court dismissed Radhayshyam's appeal against the lower court's rejection of his petition for permanent injunction and declaratory relief regarding disputed agricultural land in village Singhana. The court found that Radhayshyam failed to prove clear ownership/possession of the disputed property through credible documentary or oral evidence. His statement regarding the extent and boundaries of the land was self-contradictory (claiming both 1,430 and 1,750 square yards). The court upheld the trial judge's decision, applying the principle that a plaintiff disputing title must establish ownership through proper evidence, and cannot obtain injunction without proving valid possession or title. The appeal was dismissed with each party bearing its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts