govind ram saine vs sanju saine Advocate - SH. ROSHAN LAL SAINI — 141/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(B). Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 23rd March 2026.

Family Main Case - FAMILY MAIN

CNR: RJJH060007942025

Case disposed

Filing Number

414/2025

Filing Date

16-07-2025

Registration No

141/2025

Registration Date

16-07-2025

Court

ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ

Judge

1-ADJ I

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(B)

Petitioner(s)

govind ram saine

Adv. SH. BADRI PRASAD

Respondent(s)

sanju saine Advocate - SH. ROSHAN LAL SAINI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADJ I

23-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Final arguments

07-03-2026

Final arguments

21-02-2026

Compliance

03-01-2026

Compliance

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: 141/2025 The District Court of Khetri, Rajasthan granted a divorce decree on March 23, 2026, dissolving the marriage between Govind Ram Saine and Sanju Saine based on mutual consent under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court found that the couple, married on May 11, 2005, had developed irreconcilable ideological differences, all reconciliation attempts failed, they separated on November 29, 2020, and no prospect of cohabitation existed. Both children were ordered to remain with the mother (Sanju), and the husband had already paid full maintenance. The court deemed the divorce petition justified given the parties' complete lack of reconciliation after six months from filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 141/2025 The District Court of Khetri, Rajasthan granted a divorce decree on March 23, 2026, dissolving the marriage between Govind Ram Saine and Sanju Saine based on mutual consent under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court found that the couple, married on May 11, 2005, had developed irreconcilable ideological differences, all reconciliation attempts failed, they separated on November 29, 2020, and no prospect of cohabitation existed. Both children were ordered to remain with the mother (Sanju), and the husband had already paid full maintenance. The court deemed the divorce petition justified given the parties' complete lack of reconciliation after six months from filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case