KOSHAL CHAND vs SUNITA Advocate - SH. SUBASH CHAND SHARMA — 53/2020
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 05th May 2026.
Family Main Case - FAMILY MAIN
CNR: RJJH060004622020
Filing Number
144/2020
Filing Date
07-07-2020
Registration No
53/2020
Registration Date
07-07-2020
Court
ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ
Judge
1-ADJ I
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KOSHAL CHAND
Adv. SH. VIKRAM SINGH NIRWAN
Respondent(s)
SUNITA Advocate - SH. SUBASH CHAND SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ I
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Plaintiff Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 29-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 16-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 13-04-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Koshal Chand vs. Sunita (53/2020) Court Decision: The court REJECTED the husband's (Koshal Chand's) petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Key Reasoning: The court found that the husband failed to prove cruelty by the wife with sufficient evidence. While the husband alleged mental and physical cruelty, dowry harassment, and abandonment, the court determined these claims were largely unsubstantiated. The wife's testimony and witnesses established that the couple lived together harmoniously for 8 years post-marriage and that the husband abandoned her without valid justification around 2013, subsequently entering into a live-in relationship with another woman—actions that undermined his credibility and divorce petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Koshal Chand vs. Sunita (53/2020) Court Decision: The court REJECTED the husband's (Koshal Chand's) petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Key Reasoning: The court found that the husband failed to prove cruelty by the wife with sufficient evidence. While the husband alleged mental and physical cruelty, dowry harassment, and abandonment, the court determined these claims were largely unsubstantiated. The wife's testimony and witnesses established that the couple lived together harmoniously for 8 years post-marriage and that the husband abandoned her without valid justification around 2013, subsequently entering into a live-in relationship with another woman—actions that undermined his credibility and divorce petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts