KOSHAL CHAND vs SUNITA Advocate - SH. SUBASH CHAND SHARMA — 53/2020

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 05th May 2026.

Family Main Case - FAMILY MAIN

CNR: RJJH060004622020

Case disposed

Filing Number

144/2020

Filing Date

07-07-2020

Registration No

53/2020

Registration Date

07-07-2020

Court

ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ

Judge

1-ADJ I

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13

Petitioner(s)

KOSHAL CHAND

Adv. SH. VIKRAM SINGH NIRWAN

Respondent(s)

SUNITA Advocate - SH. SUBASH CHAND SHARMA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADJ I

05-05-2026

Disposed

04-05-2026

Final arguments

29-04-2026

Final arguments

16-04-2026

Final arguments

13-04-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

05-05-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: Koshal Chand vs. Sunita (53/2020) Court Decision: The court REJECTED the husband's (Koshal Chand's) petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Key Reasoning: The court found that the husband failed to prove cruelty by the wife with sufficient evidence. While the husband alleged mental and physical cruelty, dowry harassment, and abandonment, the court determined these claims were largely unsubstantiated. The wife's testimony and witnesses established that the couple lived together harmoniously for 8 years post-marriage and that the husband abandoned her without valid justification around 2013, subsequently entering into a live-in relationship with another woman—actions that undermined his credibility and divorce petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Koshal Chand vs. Sunita (53/2020) Court Decision: The court REJECTED the husband's (Koshal Chand's) petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Key Reasoning: The court found that the husband failed to prove cruelty by the wife with sufficient evidence. While the husband alleged mental and physical cruelty, dowry harassment, and abandonment, the court determined these claims were largely unsubstantiated. The wife's testimony and witnesses established that the couple lived together harmoniously for 8 years post-marriage and that the husband abandoned her without valid justification around 2013, subsequently entering into a live-in relationship with another woman—actions that undermined his credibility and divorce petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case