BIRBAL AND ORS vs RESHMI DEVI AND ORS Advocate - SH. SATIYANDRA KUMAR MAAN — 15/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 12th March 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJJH060003822018
Filing Number
183/2018
Filing Date
16-04-2018
Registration No
15/2018
Registration Date
20-04-2018
Court
ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ
Judge
1-ADJ I
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BIRBAL AND ORS
Adv. SH. ROSHAN LAL SAINI
Respondent(s)
RESHMI DEVI AND ORS Advocate - SH. SATIYANDRA KUMAR MAAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ I
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 23-02-2026 | Final arguments |
| 04-02-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 15/2018 - Birbal v. Reshmi Devi The court rejected the plaintiffs' (Birbal and others) suit seeking declaration and permanent injunction regarding disputed agricultural land in Lambi Jat village. The court found that plaintiffs failed to prove the land was ancestral joint Hindu family property requiring legal partition, as the predecessor Mangla Ram's sons (Mukundaram and Phoolaram) had separated before the succession act applied, making the land ancestral only to their respective descendants, not commonly sharable among all current claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 15/2018 - Birbal v. Reshmi Devi The court rejected the plaintiffs' (Birbal and others) suit seeking declaration and permanent injunction regarding disputed agricultural land in Lambi Jat village. The court found that plaintiffs failed to prove the land was ancestral joint Hindu family property requiring legal partition, as the predecessor Mangla Ram's sons (Mukundaram and Phoolaram) had separated before the succession act applied, making the land ancestral only to their respective descendants, not commonly sharable among all current claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts