PALARAM AND ORS vs BAHADUR AND ORS Advocate - SH. SATIYANDRA KUMAR MAAN — 13/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 12th March 2026.
Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL
CNR: RJJH060002822018
Filing Number
132/2018
Filing Date
20-03-2018
Registration No
13/2018
Registration Date
21-03-2018
Court
ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ
Judge
1-ADJ I
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PALARAM AND ORS
Adv. SH. LEELADHAR SHARMA
BIRBAL
LICHMA
BHAGODEVI
BASANTI DEVI
SHIVNAND
Respondent(s)
BAHADUR AND ORS Advocate - SH. SATIYANDRA KUMAR MAAN
RESHMI DEVI
RAMPRASAD
PRADEEP
BHUPENDER
ANIL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ I
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 23-02-2026 | Final arguments |
| 04-02-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Civil Regular Appeal 13/2018 Palam and Others v. Bahadur and Others Decision Date: 12 March 2026 The District Court appeal dismissed petitioners' (Palam's family) claim for a declaratory injunction regarding disputed agricultural land in Lambi Jaat, Buhaana, Jhunjhunu. The court found petitioners failed to prove their ownership rights over the contested plot and could not establish that respondents (Bahadur's family) wrongfully blocked their access. Key issues centered on property boundaries demarcated in a 2009 agreement, sufficiency of oral evidence without registered documentation, and whether petitioners acquired usage rights through 20+ years of possession. The court upheld the lower court's dismissal, finding insufficient evidence that the disputed 14-foot plot belonged to petitioners or that they had enforceable access rights against respondents' obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Civil Regular Appeal 13/2018 Palam and Others v. Bahadur and Others Decision Date: 12 March 2026 The District Court appeal dismissed petitioners' (Palam's family) claim for a declaratory injunction regarding disputed agricultural land in Lambi Jaat, Buhaana, Jhunjhunu. The court found petitioners failed to prove their ownership rights over the contested plot and could not establish that respondents (Bahadur's family) wrongfully blocked their access. Key issues centered on property boundaries demarcated in a 2009 agreement, sufficiency of oral evidence without registered documentation, and whether petitioners acquired usage rights through 20+ years of possession. The court upheld the lower court's dismissal, finding insufficient evidence that the disputed 14-foot plot belonged to petitioners or that they had enforceable access rights against respondents' obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts