RAHUL vs Rajasthan Government Advocate - AD.PP — 68/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 12th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: RJJH060002712026

Case disposed

Filing Number

141/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

68/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ

Judge

1-ADJ I

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

FIR Details

FIR Number

129

Police Station

Mehara Police Station Khetri

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

RAHUL

Adv. SH. SHERSINGH KUMAWAT

Respondent(s)

Rajasthan Government Advocate - AD.PP

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADJ I

12-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: 68/2026 - Rahul v. Rajasthan Government Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Khetri, granted bail to petitioner Rahul (age 24) on March 12, 2026, under Section 437 CrPC with conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. Key Facts & Reasoning: Rahul was accused of rioting and grievous assault under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 341, and 308, arising from a May 25, 2024 incident where he allegedly participated in an attack on the complainant's son near a religious temple, causing serious injuries. The court considered that co-accused (Vikesh, Deepak, Bhupendra, Rohit, Puneet) and co-accused Amit Kumar had already been granted bail by the High Court; Rahul had no prior criminal record; he had been in judicial custody since March 10, 2026; and he was the sole earning member supporting his family, while noting no evidence of his criminal propensity or flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 68/2026 - Rahul v. Rajasthan Government Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Khetri, granted bail to petitioner Rahul (age 24) on March 12, 2026, under Section 437 CrPC with conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. Key Facts & Reasoning: Rahul was accused of rioting and grievous assault under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 341, and 308, arising from a May 25, 2024 incident where he allegedly participated in an attack on the complainant's son near a religious temple, causing serious injuries. The court considered that co-accused (Vikesh, Deepak, Bhupendra, Rohit, Puneet) and co-accused Amit Kumar had already been granted bail by the High Court; Rahul had no prior criminal record; he had been in judicial custody since March 10, 2026; and he was the sole earning member supporting his family, while noting no evidence of his criminal propensity or flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case