RAHUL vs Rajasthan Government Advocate - AD.PP — 68/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJJH060002712026

Filing Number

141/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

68/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ

Judge

1-ADJ I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

129

Police Station

Mehara Police Station Khetri

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL

    Adv. SH. SHERSINGH KUMAWAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajasthan Government Advocate - AD.PP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 68/2026 - Rahul v. Rajasthan Government Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Khetri, granted bail to petitioner Rahul (age 24) on March 12, 2026, under Section 437 CrPC with conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. Key Facts & Reasoning: Rahul was accused of rioting and grievous assault under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 341, and 308, arising from a May 25, 2024 incident where he allegedly participated in an attack on the complainant's son near a religious temple, causing serious injuries. The court considered that co-accused (Vikesh, Deepak, Bhupendra, Rohit, Puneet) and co-accused Amit Kumar had already been granted bail by the High Court; Rahul had no prior criminal record; he had been in judicial custody since March 10, 2026; and he was the sole earning member supporting his family, while noting no evidence of his criminal propensity or flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 68/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 68/2026 - Rahul v. Rajasthan Government Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Khetri, granted bail to petitioner Rahul (age 24) on March 12, 2026, under Section 437 CrPC with conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. Key Facts & Reasoning: Rahul was accused of rioting and grievous assault under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 341, and 308, arising from a May 25, 2024 incident where he allegedly participated in an attack on the complainant's son near a religious temple, causing serious injuries. The court considered that co-accused (Vikesh, Deepak, Bhupendra, Rohit, Puneet) and co-accused Amit Kumar had already been granted bail by the High Court; Rahul had no prior criminal record; he had been in judicial custody since March 10, 2026; and he was the sole earning member supporting his family, while noting no evidence of his criminal propensity or flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case