SURENDRA URF KHINNU vs Rajasthan Government Advocate - AD.PP — 66/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 02nd April 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: RJJH060002662026

Case disposed

Filing Number

139/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

66/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ

Judge

1-ADJ I

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

FIR Details

FIR Number

19

Police Station

KHETRI NAGAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

SURENDRA URF KHINNU

Adv. SH. DAYARAM PATEL

Respondent(s)

Rajasthan Government Advocate - AD.PP

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADJ I

02-04-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

13-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

12-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

10-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

Interim Orders

16-03-2026
Order

Case 66/2026 Summary The court rejected Surendra Singh's third bail application under Section 483 CrPC on March 16, 2026. Surendra Singh was arrested for allegedly attacking a sweetshop owner (Ganga Singh) along with accomplices, extorting ₹15 lakh, vandalizing the shop, and threatening the victim. The court found that Singh had five prior criminal cases registered against him across multiple districts, indicating a pattern of criminal behavior. Considering his serious criminal background, the court determined that granting bail without observing guidelines set by the High Court would be unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 66/2026 Summary The court rejected Surendra Singh's third bail application under Section 483 CrPC on March 16, 2026. Surendra Singh was arrested for allegedly attacking a sweetshop owner (Ganga Singh) along with accomplices, extorting ₹15 lakh, vandalizing the shop, and threatening the victim. The court found that Singh had five prior criminal cases registered against him across multiple districts, indicating a pattern of criminal behavior. Considering his serious criminal background, the court determined that granting bail without observing guidelines set by the High Court would be unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case