SURENDRA URF KHINNU vs Rajasthan Government Advocate - AD.PP — 66/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 02nd April 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJJH060002662026
Filing Number
139/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
66/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ
Judge
1-ADJ I
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Refused
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
19
Police Station
KHETRI NAGAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURENDRA URF KHINNU
Adv. SH. DAYARAM PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajasthan Government Advocate - AD.PP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
ADJ I
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 66/2026 Summary The court rejected Surendra Singh's third bail application under Section 483 CrPC on March 16, 2026. Surendra Singh was arrested for allegedly attacking a sweetshop owner (Ganga Singh) along with accomplices, extorting ₹15 lakh, vandalizing the shop, and threatening the victim. The court found that Singh had five prior criminal cases registered against him across multiple districts, indicating a pattern of criminal behavior. Considering his serious criminal background, the court determined that granting bail without observing guidelines set by the High Court would be unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ I
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ I
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
ADJ I
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 66/2026
Case 66/2026 Summary The court rejected Surendra Singh's third bail application under Section 483 CrPC on March 16, 2026. Surendra Singh was arrested for allegedly attacking a sweetshop owner (Ganga Singh) along with accomplices, extorting ₹15 lakh, vandalizing the shop, and threatening the victim. The court found that Singh had five prior criminal cases registered against him across multiple districts, indicating a pattern of criminal behavior. Considering his serious criminal background, the court determined that granting bail without observing guidelines set by the High Court would be unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts