MANJU DEVI vs SURESH KUMAR Advocate - SH. SHISRAM SAINI — 10/2020
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 9. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 08th May 2026.
Family Main Case - FAMILY MAIN
CNR: RJJH060000462020
Filing Number
8/2020
Filing Date
10-Jan-2020
Registration No
10/2020
Registration Date
16-Jan-2020
Court
ADJ Khetri Taluka HQ
Judge
1-Addl District and Sessions Judge I
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANJU DEVI
Adv. SH. HAWA SINGH BABERWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.SURESH KUMAR Advocate - SH. SHISRAM SAINI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Judgement
Case Summary: Manju Devi v. Suresh Kumar (Case 10/2020) The court rejected the wife's (Manju Devi) petition for restoration of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The wife abandoned her husband (Suresh Kumar) on August 23, 2014, after six months of marriage due to cruelty and harassment regarding dowry demands. Despite attempting reconciliation through a prior divorce petition (which was dismissed), the court found the wife had actively pursued criminal cases, domestic violence proceedings, and dowry complaints against her husband and his family. The court concluded the wife was not entitled to restoration of conjugal rights as she had deliberately and without justification abandoned the marriage, having already filed multiple legal cases against her husband's family, thereby destroying the foundation for cohabitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Disposed
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
04-May-2026
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
27-Apr-2026
Misc. Documents
-
27-Apr-2026
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
17-Apr-2026
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
07-Apr-2026
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
23-Mar-2026
Misc. Documents
-
23-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
13-Mar-2026
Misc. Documents
-
13-Mar-2026
Defendant Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
08-Jan-2026
Defendant Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
30-Oct-2025
Defendant Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
18-Sep-2025
Defendant Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
04-Aug-2025
Defendant Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
05-Jul-2025
Defendant Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
19-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
15-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
04-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
21-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
19-Oct-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
26-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge I
-
26-Apr-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
-
15-Feb-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
-
19-Oct-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
-
10-Aug-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
-
06-May-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
-
04-Feb-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
-
03-Dec-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
-
12-Sep-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
-
08-Jul-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
-
08-Apr-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
-
25-Mar-2022
Issues
-
05-Feb-2022
Issues
-
11-Dec-2021
Issues
-
18-Nov-2021
Issues
-
08-Oct-2021
Issues
-
07-Aug-2021
Issues
-
24-Apr-2021
Issues
-
09-Mar-2021
Issues
ADJ
-
08-Mar-2021
Written Statement
ADJ
-
17-Dec-2020
Written Statement
ADJ
-
12-Dec-2020
Written Statement
ADJ
-
01-Oct-2020
Written Statement
ADJ
-
25-Aug-2020
Written Statement
ADJ
-
01-Jul-2020
Written Statement
ADJ
-
22-May-2020
Written Statement
ADJ
-
05-Mar-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jan-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 10/2020
Case Summary: Manju Devi v. Suresh Kumar (Case 10/2020) The court rejected the wife's (Manju Devi) petition for restoration of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The wife abandoned her husband (Suresh Kumar) on August 23, 2014, after six months of marriage due to cruelty and harassment regarding dowry demands. Despite attempting reconciliation through a prior divorce petition (which was dismissed), the court found the wife had actively pursued criminal cases, domestic violence proceedings, and dowry complaints against her husband and his family. The court concluded the wife was not entitled to restoration of conjugal rights as she had deliberately and without justification abandoned the marriage, having already filed multiple legal cases against her husband's family, thereby destroying the foundation for cohabitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts