STATE vs Vinod Kumar Advocate - Sh. Mandroop Singh — 2392/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJJH020044482023

Filing Number

4418/2023

Filing Date

02-Nov-2023

Registration No

2392/2023

Registration Date

02-Nov-2023

Court

CJM ACJM JM Jhunjhunu District HQ

Judge

5-Acjm

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

79

Police Station

Mahila Police Thana Jhunjhunu

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vinod Kumar Advocate - Sh. Mandroop Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Vinod Kumar (2392/2023) Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhunjhunu acquitted defendant Vinod Kumar of dowry harassment charges under IPC Section 498A (cruelty by husband/in-laws) on 24.03.2026, finding insufficient evidence. He was previously acquitted under Section 406 (criminal breach of trust) following a settlement between parties. Key Reasoning: All three prosecution witnesses, including the complainant wife Savita herself, contradicted the dowry allegations during examination. The complainant admitted in court that the accused never demanded dowry or harassed her, contradicting her own police complaint. Finding the witnesses hostile/unreliable and lacking substantive evidence beyond doubt, the court granted the accused the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  7. 10-Nov-2025

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  8. 16-Jun-2025

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  9. 21-Apr-2025

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  10. 21-Nov-2024

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  11. 12-Aug-2024

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  12. 06-May-2024

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    Acjm

  13. 07-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 02-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2392/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Vinod Kumar (2392/2023) Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhunjhunu acquitted defendant Vinod Kumar of dowry harassment charges under IPC Section 498A (cruelty by husband/in-laws) on 24.03.2026, finding insufficient evidence. He was previously acquitted under Section 406 (criminal breach of trust) following a settlement between parties. Key Reasoning: All three prosecution witnesses, including the complainant wife Savita herself, contradicted the dowry allegations during examination. The complainant admitted in court that the accused never demanded dowry or harassed her, contradicting her own police complaint. Finding the witnesses hostile/unreliable and lacking substantive evidence beyond doubt, the court granted the accused the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case