Khetaram vs State Advocate - APO — 155/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363. Disposed: Contested--Disposed otherwise on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report - FR

CNR: RJJH020011332025

Filing Number

1133/2025

Filing Date

08-Apr-2025

Registration No

155/2025

Registration Date

08-Apr-2025

Court

CJM ACJM JM Jhunjhunu District HQ

Judge

4-Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

77

Police Station

Police Station Kotwali Jhunjhunun

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 363

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Khetaram

    Adv. Not available

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Advocate - APO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 155/2025 Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhunjhunu, rejected the police's final report under IPC Section 363 (abduction) and took cognizance against Dr. Navneet (then medical officer at BDK Hospital, Jhunjhunu) under Section 234 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (falsifying certificates) for issuing a postmortem report without examining the deceased's body. The court found that Dr. Navneet issued the report knowing it contained false information about the cause of death, violating established medical procedures and breaching his official duty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 16-Jan-2026

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 15-Dec-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 05-Dec-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 25-Nov-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 14-Nov-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 01-Nov-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 28-Oct-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 07-Oct-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 24-Sep-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 15-Sep-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 19-Jul-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 11-Jul-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 21-Jun-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 22-May-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 17-May-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 06-May-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 30-Apr-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 25-Apr-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 22-Apr-2025

    Compliance

    Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 08-Apr-2025

    OrderView PDF

  30. 08-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 08-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 155/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 155/2025 Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhunjhunu, rejected the police's final report under IPC Section 363 (abduction) and took cognizance against Dr. Navneet (then medical officer at BDK Hospital, Jhunjhunu) under Section 234 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (falsifying certificates) for issuing a postmortem report without examining the deceased's body. The court found that Dr. Navneet issued the report knowing it contained false information about the cause of death, violating established medical procedures and breaching his official duty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case