Khetaram vs State Advocate - APO — 155/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363. Disposed: Contested--Disposed otherwise on 16th March 2026.
Final Report - FR
CNR: RJJH020011332025
Filing Number
1133/2025
Filing Date
08-04-2025
Registration No
155/2025
Registration Date
08-04-2025
Court
CJM ACJM JM Jhunjhunu District HQ
Judge
4-Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed otherwise
FIR Details
FIR Number
77
Police Station
Police Station Kotwali Jhunjhunun
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Khetaram
Adv. Not available
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - APO
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 12-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 06-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 24-02-2026 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 155/2025 Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhunjhunu, rejected the police's final report under IPC Section 363 (abduction) and took cognizance against Dr. Navneet (then medical officer at BDK Hospital, Jhunjhunu) under Section 234 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (falsifying certificates) for issuing a postmortem report without examining the deceased's body. The court found that Dr. Navneet issued the report knowing it contained false information about the cause of death, violating established medical procedures and breaching his official duty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 155/2025 Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhunjhunu, rejected the police's final report under IPC Section 363 (abduction) and took cognizance against Dr. Navneet (then medical officer at BDK Hospital, Jhunjhunu) under Section 234 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (falsifying certificates) for issuing a postmortem report without examining the deceased's body. The court found that Dr. Navneet issued the report knowing it contained false information about the cause of death, violating established medical procedures and breaching his official duty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts