STATE vs TEJPAL NOONIYA ETC Advocate - Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma — 1290/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,120B. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: RJJH020002792016
Filing Number
2910/2016
Filing Date
28-01-2016
Registration No
1290/2016
Registration Date
28-01-2016
Court
CJM ACJM JM Jhunjhunu District HQ
Judge
4-Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
27
Police Station
Police Station Nawalgarh
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
TEJPAL NOONIYA ETC Advocate - Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma
Mahesh Kumar
Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Final arguments
Restored
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 07-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 07-03-2026 | Restored |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Tejpal Singh Nooniya & Others (Case 1290/2016) Court Decision: The court acquitted accused Mahesh Kumar of all charges under IPC Sections 420, 406, 120-B and the Chit Fund Prohibition Act, 1978. Key Facts: The complainant alleged that the accused operated an illegal money circulation scheme ("Priya Home Study Pvt Ltd") and fraudulently induced her to invest ₹35,400 by promising returns, then absconded without payment. Reasoning: The court found insufficient evidence to prove deception or wrongful misappropriation against Mahesh Kumar. The complainant became hostile during trial and settled with the accused. Other witnesses failed to establish that Mahesh Kumar personally deceived them or received their money. The court noted that mere company membership without proof of deceit cannot constitute fraud under Section 420 IPC, and absent proper custody, misappropriation under Section 406 cannot be proven. No documents showed Mahesh Kumar's involvement in scheme operations or solicitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Tejpal Singh Nooniya & Others (Case 1290/2016) Court Decision: The court acquitted accused Mahesh Kumar of all charges under IPC Sections 420, 406, 120-B and the Chit Fund Prohibition Act, 1978. Key Facts: The complainant alleged that the accused operated an illegal money circulation scheme ("Priya Home Study Pvt Ltd") and fraudulently induced her to invest ₹35,400 by promising returns, then absconded without payment. Reasoning: The court found insufficient evidence to prove deception or wrongful misappropriation against Mahesh Kumar. The complainant became hostile during trial and settled with the accused. Other witnesses failed to establish that Mahesh Kumar personally deceived them or received their money. The court noted that mere company membership without proof of deceit cannot constitute fraud under Section 420 IPC, and absent proper custody, misappropriation under Section 406 cannot be proven. No documents showed Mahesh Kumar's involvement in scheme operations or solicitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts