STATE vs TEJPAL SINGH ETC. Advocate - Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma — 1224/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: RJJH020001512016
Filing Number
2763/2016
Filing Date
13-01-2016
Registration No
1224/2016
Registration Date
13-01-2016
Court
CJM ACJM JM Jhunjhunu District HQ
Judge
4-Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
41
Police Station
Police Station Buhana
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
TEJPAL SINGH ETC. Advocate - Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Senior Civil Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Final arguments
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 05-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 26-02-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Tejpal Singh & Others (CIS 1224/2016) Court Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhunjhunu, acquitted accused Mahesh Kumar on March 25, 2026, of charges under Sections 420, 406, 120-B IPC and Sections 3/4, 5, 6 of the Chit Fund Scheme (Prohibition) Act, 1978. The court found insufficient evidence that Mahesh Kumar defrauded complainant Sube Singh of ₹86,600 through a fraudulent investment scheme involving Priya Home Study Private Limited bonds. Key Reasoning: The court held that prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Mahesh Kumar committed cheating or criminal breach of trust, noting inconsistencies in the complainant's statements regarding who received funds, lack of direct evidence linking the accused to the bonds, absence of receipts, and witnesses' admissions of never meeting the accused or receiving any deception from him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State v. Tejpal Singh & Others (CIS 1224/2016) Court Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhunjhunu, acquitted accused Mahesh Kumar on March 25, 2026, of charges under Sections 420, 406, 120-B IPC and Sections 3/4, 5, 6 of the Chit Fund Scheme (Prohibition) Act, 1978. The court found insufficient evidence that Mahesh Kumar defrauded complainant Sube Singh of ₹86,600 through a fraudulent investment scheme involving Priya Home Study Private Limited bonds. Key Reasoning: The court held that prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Mahesh Kumar committed cheating or criminal breach of trust, noting inconsistencies in the complainant's statements regarding who received funds, lack of direct evidence linking the accused to the bonds, absence of receipts, and witnesses' admissions of never meeting the accused or receiving any deception from him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts