STATE vs Ankush Kumar Advocate - Sh. Tejpal Singh — 144/2024
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8,21,22. Status: Prosecution Evidence. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJJH010020312024
Filing Number
3601/2024
Filing Date
06-Nov-2024
Registration No
144/2024
Registration Date
06-Nov-2024
Court
DJ ADJ Jhunjhunu District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
54
Police Station
Gothara Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Adv. P.P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ankush Kumar Advocate - Sh. Tejpal Singh
-
2.Mamraj Swami
Adv. Sh. Jhabar Singh
Case History
-
04-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Jun-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Jun-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jun-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
27-May-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
26-May-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Apr-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Apr-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Jul-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Jun-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
23-May-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
03-May-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Apr-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Mar-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2025
Order
Case Summary: 144/2024 (Case No. 113/2025) Outcome: Bail petition DISMISSED/REJECTED The Session Judge, Jhunjhunu, rejected the bail application filed by four accused persons (Banty Singh, Vikas Singh, Ashish, and Anurag) under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found sufficient evidence against the accused for serious offenses including criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, attempt to murder (BNS Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 333, 140(4), 109(1), 324(4), 117(2)). The court noted the gravity of offenses, prior criminal records of some accused, and circumstances of the case warranted continued judicial custody without bail relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Feb-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 144/2024
Case Summary: 144/2024 (Case No. 113/2025) Outcome: Bail petition DISMISSED/REJECTED The Session Judge, Jhunjhunu, rejected the bail application filed by four accused persons (Banty Singh, Vikas Singh, Ashish, and Anurag) under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found sufficient evidence against the accused for serious offenses including criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, attempt to murder (BNS Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 333, 140(4), 109(1), 324(4), 117(2)). The court noted the gravity of offenses, prior criminal records of some accused, and circumstances of the case warranted continued judicial custody without bail relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts