Rajesh Kumar vs STATE Advocate - P.P — 142/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 08th April 2026.

Cr. Revision

CNR: RJJH010016462025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1357/2025

Filing Date

29-08-2025

Registration No

142/2025

Registration Date

01-09-2025

Court

DJ ADJ Jhunjhunu District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

Rajesh Kumar

Adv. Sh. Rajkumar Saini

Respondent(s)

STATE Advocate - P.P

Asharam

Adv. Not available

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

08-04-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Final arguments

13-02-2026

Final arguments

02-02-2026

Final arguments

06-01-2026

Final arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

08-04-2026
Order

Case 142/2025 Summary The Session Court, Jhunjhunu set aside the Sub-Divisional Magistrate's order dated 21.07.2025 imposing a six-month peace bond on petitioner Rajesh Kumar, finding that mandatory procedural requirements under sections 130 and 133 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (Indian Civil Security Code) were violated. The court held that the lower court failed to provide a summary of the complaint, specify bond details, and furnish a copy of its order with the notice as legally mandated, rendering the order procedurally defective and unenforceable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 142/2025 Summary The Session Court, Jhunjhunu set aside the Sub-Divisional Magistrate's order dated 21.07.2025 imposing a six-month peace bond on petitioner Rajesh Kumar, finding that mandatory procedural requirements under sections 130 and 133 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (Indian Civil Security Code) were violated. The court held that the lower court failed to provide a summary of the complaint, specify bond details, and furnish a copy of its order with the notice as legally mandated, rendering the order procedurally defective and unenforceable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Jhunjhunu District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case