Safi mohammd vs STATE Advocate - P.P — 175/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJJH010005752026

Filing Number

447/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

175/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Jhunjhunu District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

95

Police Station

Police Station Gudha

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Safi mohammd

    Adv. Sh. Kuldeep Singh Shekhawat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE Advocate - P.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary - 175/2026 The Session Court, Jhunjhunu granted bail to Safi Mohammad under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure in an NDPS Act case (FIR 95/2026). Police seized 3.090 kg of cannabis from the petitioner on 18.03.2026 under Sections 8/20 NDPS Act. The court found the quantity was not commercial and no further investigation was required, noting the petitioner had been in custody since arrest with prior criminal records being insufficiently probative for continued detention. Bail was granted on furnishing two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each and personal bond of Rs. 50,000, with the condition of regular court attendance until trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 175/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - 175/2026 The Session Court, Jhunjhunu granted bail to Safi Mohammad under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure in an NDPS Act case (FIR 95/2026). Police seized 3.090 kg of cannabis from the petitioner on 18.03.2026 under Sections 8/20 NDPS Act. The court found the quantity was not commercial and no further investigation was required, noting the petitioner had been in custody since arrest with prior criminal records being insufficiently probative for continued detention. Bail was granted on furnishing two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each and personal bond of Rs. 50,000, with the condition of regular court attendance until trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case