Mukesh kumar vs STATE Advocate - P.P — 156/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJJH010004962026

Filing Number

384/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

156/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Jhunjhunu District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

48

Police Station

Police Station Excise, Nawalgarh

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mukesh kumar

    Adv. Not available

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE Advocate - P.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Session Court, Jhunjhunu granted bail to Mukesh Kumar, who was arrested for allegedly possessing 2 liters of illicit liquor under the Rajasthan Excise Act Sections 16/54. The court found that substantial investigation and recovery had already occurred, the offense was magistrate-triable (not involving capital punishment), and bail was justified considering the overall facts and circumstances. The bail was granted on condition of depositing two sureties of ₹25,000 each and a personal bond of ₹50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 156/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Session Court, Jhunjhunu granted bail to Mukesh Kumar, who was arrested for allegedly possessing 2 liters of illicit liquor under the Rajasthan Excise Act Sections 16/54. The court found that substantial investigation and recovery had already occurred, the offense was magistrate-triable (not involving capital punishment), and bail was justified considering the overall facts and circumstances. The bail was granted on condition of depositing two sureties of ₹25,000 each and a personal bond of ₹50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case