Rohitash vs STATE Advocate - P.P — 151/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJJH010004462026

Filing Number

336/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

151/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Jhunjhunu District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

Police Station Dhanuri

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rohitash

    Adv. Not available

  2. 2.Vedprakash

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE Advocate - P.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 151/2026 Court Decision: The Session Court of Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan granted bail to petitioners Rohitash and Vedprakash on March 12, 2026. The petitioners were arrested for allegedly possessing 336 bottles of unlicensed indigenous liquor under Sections 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act, following their initial bail rejection by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on March 9, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that significant investigation and seizure had already been completed, Vedprakash had no prior criminal record, and one petitioner was acquitted in a previous case. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the court deemed bail appropriate, imposing conditions of two sureties of ₹25,000 each and a personal bond of ₹50,000 per petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 151/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 151/2026 Court Decision: The Session Court of Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan granted bail to petitioners Rohitash and Vedprakash on March 12, 2026. The petitioners were arrested for allegedly possessing 336 bottles of unlicensed indigenous liquor under Sections 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act, following their initial bail rejection by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on March 9, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that significant investigation and seizure had already been completed, Vedprakash had no prior criminal record, and one petitioner was acquitted in a previous case. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the court deemed bail appropriate, imposing conditions of two sureties of ₹25,000 each and a personal bond of ₹50,000 per petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case