Rohitash vs STATE Advocate - P.P — 151/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 12th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJJH010004462026
Filing Number
336/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
151/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Jhunjhunu District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
24
Police Station
Police Station Dhanuri
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rohitash
Adv. Not available
Vedprakash
Respondent(s)
STATE Advocate - P.P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 151/2026 Court Decision: The Session Court of Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan granted bail to petitioners Rohitash and Vedprakash on March 12, 2026. The petitioners were arrested for allegedly possessing 336 bottles of unlicensed indigenous liquor under Sections 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act, following their initial bail rejection by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on March 9, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that significant investigation and seizure had already been completed, Vedprakash had no prior criminal record, and one petitioner was acquitted in a previous case. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the court deemed bail appropriate, imposing conditions of two sureties of ₹25,000 each and a personal bond of ₹50,000 per petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 151/2026 Court Decision: The Session Court of Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan granted bail to petitioners Rohitash and Vedprakash on March 12, 2026. The petitioners were arrested for allegedly possessing 336 bottles of unlicensed indigenous liquor under Sections 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act, following their initial bail rejection by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on March 9, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that significant investigation and seizure had already been completed, Vedprakash had no prior criminal record, and one petitioner was acquitted in a previous case. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the court deemed bail appropriate, imposing conditions of two sureties of ₹25,000 each and a personal bond of ₹50,000 per petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts