Narendra vs Saroj Advocate - SH. ANIL KUMAR SAINI — 9/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Appeal

CNR: RJJH010000882025

Filing Number

67/2025

Filing Date

16-Jan-2025

Registration No

9/2025

Registration Date

21-Jan-2025

Court

DJ ADJ Jhunjhunu District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Narendra

    Adv. Sh. Sumit Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Saroj Advocate - SH. ANIL KUMAR SAINI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    Case Summary: 9/2025 - Narendra v. Saroj Court Decision: The Session Court (Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan) dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Narendra and upheld the lower court's order dated 11.12.2024 under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that Narendra committed domestic violence against his wife Saroj through dowry demands, physical and mental cruelty, and harassment. The court imposed a protection order under Section 18 and directed Narendra to pay ₹6,000 monthly maintenance (₹4,000 for Saroj's sustenance and ₹2,000 for their son's support). The appellate court rejected Narendra's arguments regarding procedural deficiencies, finding sufficient evidence in witness testimonies to establish domestic violence despite the absence of a domestic incident report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Judgment

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 01-Jun-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 11-May-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 16-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  10. 05-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  11. 15-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  12. 15-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  13. 20-Nov-2025

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  14. 30-Oct-2025

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  15. 04-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Adr Reports

    District and Sessions Judge

  16. 03-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Adr Reports

    District and Sessions Judge

  17. 13-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Adr Reports

    District and Sessions Judge

  18. 24-Jul-2025

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  19. 02-Jul-2025

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  20. 09-Jun-2025

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  21. 12-May-2025

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  22. 15-Apr-2025

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  23. 20-Mar-2025

    Service of Summons/bailable warrant

    District and Sessions Judge

  24. 24-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 16-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 9/2025 - Narendra v. Saroj Court Decision: The Session Court (Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan) dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Narendra and upheld the lower court's order dated 11.12.2024 under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that Narendra committed domestic violence against his wife Saroj through dowry demands, physical and mental cruelty, and harassment. The court imposed a protection order under Section 18 and directed Narendra to pay ₹6,000 monthly maintenance (₹4,000 for Saroj's sustenance and ₹2,000 for their son's support). The appellate court rejected Narendra's arguments regarding procedural deficiencies, finding sufficient evidence in witness testimonies to establish domestic violence despite the absence of a domestic incident report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case